>> 10s vs 5 +5 split
>> 10s vs 6 +5 split

> Funny how, when something really really simple that
> works is developed, people immediately start looking
> for ways to make it more complicated (This is intended
> as a general comment on the human condition - don't
> take it personally).

> Since this system would appeal primarily to casual
> players, I don't think splitting 10's should be
> included. Casual players usually do not split 10's
> anyway, not because they are worried about heat, but
> simply because they are reluctant to break up a likely
> winning hand.

So, has anyone run the numbers using a +4 index value for these two plays? If it's still worth it that might be a good middle ground, as that's the same value nearly all the other plays use. That barely adds to the complexity, and I for one would be interested in adopting it if the math showed it gave a meaningful gain.

On the other hand.....does splitting tens only sometimes like that really attract heat?