-
Magician: If I understand this correctly...
> And this is 6:5 BJ!
So for real 3:2 blackjack we would expect all the bars in the graph to increase by around 0.01, right? More in the higher TCs of course, but more or less uniformly throughout?
-
Magician: Re: Thanks all.
> reference Magician .. it would be nice to be able to
> sim an 85%-100% pen game. I would'nt be the first
> 'theorist' here trying to figure out something of
> marginal use; as for the dreamer comment, odd games
> pop out in places you'd never expect.
I agree. I think this feature would have value, though probably more educational though financial. I certainly didn't mean to use those labels in any negative way (although I see by your use of 'scare quotes' above that they might be interpreted that way).
-
Norm Wattenberger: Nothing in SD is that tidy:) *NM*
-
Sun Runner: No negativity taken! :) *NM*
-
Norm Wattenberger: Chart This!
OK, you asked for it. The chart below shows the differences in advantage between 3:2 Blackjac and 6:5 Fraudjack by TC by section of the deck.
CVCX Online
-
Magician: Point Taken! *NM*
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks