> To make apples-to-apples comparisons of
> Hi-Lo, Red 7, and K-O, and to make the K-O
> charts that appear in the SCORE chapter of
> BJA3 and previous editions, the I18 and Fab4
> were used.

> In his separate booklet of the WGBJS for
> K-O, John explains that he isn't going to
> publish the indices used, because the
> authors requested that he not do so, but: 1)
> One single index was used for any given
> given play (although, of course, it might
> have changed as number of decks changed);
> and 2) The indices were taken from K-O
> preferred, when the index existed;
> however, if the index wasn't a part of K-O
> (P), John created it (via SBA) so as to
> generate a complete set of I18 and Fab4
> indices.

> Clear?

No, actually.

From BJA3 (pb), page 165: "Not only was K-O using the Preferred version (which means that only a few index values were used from the "Illustrious "18" and "Fab 4"), but the values that were picked were not necessarily optimized for the penetration levels used"

This seems to me to indicate that KO Preferred with the reduced rounded strategy matrix was used. In addition, Norm states in another post that the KO matrix was used in the CVCX/CVData sims, leading me to believe that he did the same in the updated Chapter 10 sims.