-
Cacarulo: Re: bet vs. play adjustment
> What if you stick with normal hi-lo indices
> for most plays, and only make the ace
> adjustment for those plays where you can
> expect significant gains? Maybe I'm missing
> something, but I thought that would be
> easier to use, since you only end up
> adjusting the primary count occassionally,
> as opposed to betting adjustment, which
> you'd have to do almost every round.
Correct. This is a better way of using a side count of aces.
Sincerely,
Cac
-
Cacarulo: Although you need to be very fast
when a playing adjustment arises. With the other method (betting adjustment) you have plenty of time at the end of the round.
Cac
-
Toffler: Here are your results Sunfighter
For 6D, S17, DOA, DAS, 5/6 pen
Assuming a $10,000 bank played optimally with 13.5% ROR:
Hi-Lo Il-18: Win/60 hands = $25.18; DI = 6.47
Hi-Lo w A side: Win/60 hands = $27.77; DI = 6.80
Toffler
-
Don Schlesinger: Re: Here are your results Sunfighter
> For 6D, S17, DOA, DAS, 5/6 pen
> Assuming a $10,000 bank played optimally
> with 13.5% ROR:
> Hi-Lo Il-18: Win/60 hands = $25.18; DI =
> 6.47
> Hi-Lo w A side: Win/60 hands = $27.77; DI =
> 6.80
Just out of curiosity, why would you quote a win rate per 60 hands? Do you usually play full tables? Very bad idea.
Don
-
Toffler: Re: Here are your results Sunfighter
I play DD game. I occassionally play 6D. I usually play heads up or 3 players max. I haven't played but once in past 4 years and I actually thought you got about 60 hands per hour at 6D. I just getting back into BJ. I play a lot of poker.
-
Don Schlesinger: Re: Here are your results Sunfighter
> I play DD game. I occassionally play 6D. I
> usually play heads up or 3 players max.
With three players, you will get at least 100 hands per hour. Heads-up, you might get 200.
Don
-
Cacarulo: Besides, you need to double count the ace *NM*
-
sunfighter: Re: Here are your results Sunfighter
> For 6D, S17, DOA, DAS, 5/6 pen
> Assuming a $10,000 bank played optimally
> with 13.5% ROR:
> Hi-Lo Il-18: Win/60 hands = $25.18; DI =
> 6.47
> Hi-Lo w A side: Win/60 hands = $27.77; DI =
> 6.80
This is about 10% more?I think it is to much.
The other big players said it does not worth it.
Are you positive?
> Toffler
-
Toffler: Re: Here are your results Sunfighter
Yes I'm positive.
If the bets were the same per count in both sims, then the diffrence would be less than 10% but ROR would drop for the Hi-Lo with Ace side count. The better count allows you to bet more, therefore win more and enjoy the same ROR for a given bankroll.
Toffler
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks