-
Green Goblin: UAPC v. Hi-Opt II
UAPC has a higher BC & PE than Hi-Opt II, yet it loses to its level-2 counterpart in the SCORE article. Why is that?
-
Don Schlesinger: Re: UAPC v. Hi-Opt II
> UAPC has a higher BC & PE than Hi-Opt
> II, yet it loses to its level-2 counterpart
> in the SCORE article. Why is that?
Richard Reid's bjmath.com site gives the following BC, PE and IE for the two counts. Note that, according to Richard, Hi-Opt II has the higher BC and also the higher Insurance Efficiency.
Don
Uston APC 0.977 0.691 0.913
Hi Opt II 0.982 0.668 0.920
-
Syph: I`m still waiting for ...
Doctor Octopus to make an appearance.
-
Green Goblin: So you're waitin' for me, huh?
I play the Uston Adv. plus/minus, but would like to switch to the Hi-Opt II when I have more experience with counting in the casino.
-
Doctor Octopus: re:So you're waitin' for me, huh?
Hey GG,you're stealin' my identity!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks