I was going over Stanford's index on page 46-47 of PBJ and would like to know if this still stands as correct using the Hi/Lo count or does someboby have a more simplified version of this without losing too much over the original. I redid the chart in Excel and am currently colouring in the useful counts to help in memorizing this behemoth . I guess you couldn't just bring it to the table like the BS chart ?
Thanks as usual
Also to Norm , do you happen to have a table that matches this playing strategy for CVBJ or is this copyright and I'll have to enter it manually ?
> I was going over Stanford's index on page
> 46-47 of PBJ and would like to know if this
> still stands as correct using the Hi/Lo
> count or does someboby have a more
> simplified version of this without losing
> too much over the original. I redid the
> chart in Excel and am currently colouring in
> the useful counts to help in memorizing this
> behemoth . I guess you couldn't just bring
> it to the table like the BS chart ?
> Thanks as usual
> Also to Norm , do you happen to have a table
> that matches this playing strategy for CVBJ
> or is this copyright and I'll have to enter
> it manually ?
Yes, it is the '94 Basic Hi-Lo strategy included in CV with Stanford's permission. There is a simpler chart in Snyder's Blackbelt in Blackjack called Hi-Lo Lite. But, BiB is out of print. Those tables are also in CV. One difference, Hi-Lo Lite uses half-decks for TC calculation (if memory serves me well.) Actually, I think Hi-Lo Lite works better with full decks and doubling the indexes.
Posting Permissions
-*-
Bookmarks