Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Fred Renzey: Theoretical Card Clumping question

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    humble
    Guest

    humble: Re: Theoretical Card Clumping question

    As I understand it, you will have observed some 30 or so instances of the original test situation in your little experiment. Did you indeed find in about 20 of these 30 cases that the holecard was a 10 (now there's variance for you), and is that why you ask your question?

    Regards,
    h

  2. #2
    Fred Renzey
    Guest

    Fred Renzey: Re: Theoretical Card Clumping question

    > As I understand it, you will have observed
    > some 30 or so instances of the original test
    > situation in your little experiment. Did you
    > indeed find in about 20 of these 30 cases
    > that the holecard was a 10 (now there's
    > variance for you), and is that why you ask
    > your question?

    > Regards,
    > h

    Reply: No, I don't really know what percentage of the originally qualified test cases revealed a 10 in the dealer's hole. I only know that all 300 test cases, most of them the modified hybrid produced 33% Tens. My concern was whether I could have corrupted the test by admitting other evidence that should seem to produce the same results.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.