See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: CVCX Sim Comparison

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. 04-17-2012, 09:08 PM #1
    seriousplayer
    seriousplayer is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    2,591

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    CVCX Sim Comparison

    Can anybody tell me why the %W/L is a big difference in single deck H17 noDAS DA2 using the REKO Count with all +2 indices? A Copy of the sim is below.

    untitled 2.JPG
    Above is the preloaded sim that comes with the CVCX Software.

    untitled.JPG
    This is mine my simulations for 4 players.

    Both is simulated with 2 billion hands with the same rule. Why is the %W/L for 3 players compare to 4 players makes a big difference? For 4 players %W/L is 1.280% for 3 players %W/L is 1.061%.

    Does anybody else has the same results for this?
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads

  1. How do I simulate this in CVCX or CVDATA?
    By seriousplayer in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-23-2012, 04:41 AM
  2. CVCX Online Viewer
    By Thirdbaseman in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-18-2012, 12:15 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules

Other QFIT Sites

Internal Links

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.