Software to compare different strategies

[Intermediate]

There's a lot to unpack . This could be overwhelming if you are a newbie. Did you know what strategies you intended to compare e.g., Basic vs. Hi-Lo, Level 1 vs Level 2 or 3 Count system, Flat bet vs Spread, Play All vs Back Count? If you're talking about an "essay" vs. a "paper", you would need to keep it very high level. How much time do you have to put this together?

[mt4]

Hi Norm,
PowerSim works fine, I doubt that the problems you mentioned are real issues.

Accuracy concerns are addressed here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20211211...e_accuracy.htm

PowerSim does not even calculate TC correctly

It uses exact card for the calculation and then floors the result.
"calculate the count as precisely as possible, to the exact card" -- Don S

and cannot calculate optimal bets correctly.

My link shows it uses the most accurate calculation.

It also uses a useless linear congruential generator for random numbers.

It simulates blackjack card counting rapidly and accurately, using a pseudo-RNG. The results are consistent and accurate, therefore "not useless".

I don't know what simplified REFO-F means since REKO-F is the non-simplified version of REKO. F stands for Full.

I left out all split indices.

It might be old software, but it is not a mistake. "Don't laugh, it works".

[iCountNTrack]

Hi Norm,
PowerSim works fine, I doubt that the problems you mentioned are real issues.

Accuracy concerns are addressed here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20211211...e_accuracy.htm

It uses exact card for the calculation and then floors the result.
"calculate the count as precisely as possible, to the exact card" -- Don S

My link shows it uses the most accurate calculation.

It simulates blackjack card counting rapidly and accurately, using a pseudo-RNG. The results are consistent and accurate, therefore "not useless".

I left out all split indices.

It might be old software, but it is not a mistake. "Don't laugh, it works".

Jesus, Mary and Joseph!