Hi everyone,
I’m new to counting, so please bear with me !
Im told that Basic Strategy SUPPOSED to help the players to LOSE the least in the long run.
However we all know that the point the casino only flipped over 1 card instead of both cards is to get the Players to ASSUME that the dealer having (17,18,19,20) so that the players will take a hit whenever they were dealt stiff hands (12,13,14,15,16)
If the players BUST The casino gets an automatic WIN and DID NOT have to risk anything for it.
If the players hit and MADE 17,18,19,20,21 from those stiff hands then the casino still have another chance to draw cards to get a WIN or PUSH
So would anyone with computer or math knowledge PLEASE run sims to see how much disadvantage or advantages to use NO BUST STRATEGY + card counting in comparison to the conventional Basic Strategy + card counting + Illustrious 18 deviations ?
Still double down and split pairs like normally would, however STAND on all 12,13,14,15,16 vs any dealer up card (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,T,A)
6 decks, 75% pen, H17, DAS, No RSA, No Surrender,
Wong in at True 1, 1-12 bet spreads,
playing deviations for NO BUST STRATEGY
Insurance +3
T,T v 5,6 split +6,+5
Double T v A +5
Double 9 v 7 +4
Double 9 v 2. +1
Double 8 v 5. +5
Double 8 v 6. +3
Please and THANK YOU in advance!!!
Bookmarks