See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 13 of 35

Thread: 6:5 Blackjack Beatable?

  1. #1


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    6:5 Blackjack Beatable?

    Slim Pickens these days. Casino only offers 6:5 black jack, H17, 8 decks, but penetration is fantastic. Was wondering if the game was beatable for a counter? If so under what circumstances (Bet spread etc.)?

    Thanks

  2. #2


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Sundown View Post
    Slim Pickens these days. Casino only offers 6:5 black jack, H17, 8 decks, but penetration is fantastic. Was wondering if the game was beatable for a counter? If so under what circumstances (Bet spread etc.)?

    Thanks
    Are you talking 7/8 or 7.5/8. Is surrender offered? Wouldn’t play it if it’s not. What spread can you get away with? No sense playing without it. Should be able to use large spread since it is 6:5.

    Yes, it’s beatable. Normally, I prefer heads up on 6 deck, but on 8 deck would like one other player to help absorb lousy counts and where I can spread to 2 in nice counts. I would tend to use low spreads in first part of shoe - the extra 2 decks creating huge additional wild permutations of cards. Spread steadily increases further you go into the shoe. Make sure your huge super max bet is still low ror on bank roll. Make sure your trip roll is much bigger than normal.

    With surrender and 6:5, you’re getting close to 2% house edge - over 2% if no surrender. Also, since you’re likely flat betting usually first half of shoe, house will know your counting once you start ramping - shouldn’t bother them.

    I would prefer 4/6 6 deck with surrender and 3:2 plus a few other goodies. Please note I haven’t simmed my comments - off the cuff observation.

  3. #3


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    8 deck is pretty hard to beat. If the pen is really good, you might be able to get a SCORE of $20 back-counting it, or spreading min to max with full indexes. Goes positive at about +4 H17 DAS no surrender.


    Zen count generally gives you a lot better results. Roughly 25% better. Goes positive at about +7 true.
    The Cash Cow.

  4. #4


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Damn house still has an edge of 2.5%??? But then still got to subtract basic strategy and other variables to the game correct? Yes surrender is offered. I will spread 1-15 and even more as I don't care about this Casino, it's just on my way to somewhere else.

    Thanks for your input Freightman!!

  5. #5


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Thanks Moo321. I play KO with a True Count and that bad boy gets me the money in terms of 10s and Aces coming out the shoe when my count warrants max bet.

  6. #6


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Freightman View Post
    Are you talking 7/8 or 7.5/8. Is surrender offered? Wouldn’t play it if it’s not. What spread can you get away with? No sense playing without it. Should be able to use large spread since it is 6:5.

    Yes, it’s beatable. Normally, I prefer heads up on 6 deck, but on 8 deck would like one other player to help absorb lousy counts and where I can spread to 2 in nice counts. I would tend to use low spreads in first part of shoe - the extra 2 decks creating huge additional wild permutations of cards. Spread steadily increases further you go into the shoe. Make sure your huge super max bet is still low ror on bank roll. Make sure your trip roll is much bigger than normal.

    With surrender and 6:5, you’re getting close to 2% house edge - over 2% if no surrender. Also, since you’re likely flat betting usually first half of shoe, house will know your counting once you start ramping - shouldn’t bother them.

    I would prefer 4/6 6 deck with surrender and 3:2 plus a few other goodies. Please note I haven’t simmed my comments - off the cuff observation.
    Initial house advantage isn't as important with 6:5. It's more about pen, number of decks, and being able to spread a lot. You need at least two of these to be favorable to get an edge. If you get all three, you can have a great game.


    S17, DAS, RSA, LS aren't going to make a 6:5 game playable if there's a deck and a half cut off.
    The Cash Cow.

  7. #7


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Sundown View Post
    Damn house still has an edge of 2.5%??? But then still got to subtract basic strategy and other variables to the game correct? Yes surrender is offered. I will spread 1-15 and even more as I don't care about this Casino, it's just on my way to somewhere else.

    Thanks for your input Freightman!!
    1 to 15 spread won't beat 6:5 games out of a shoe. If it's an 8 decker with H17, you won't even get a positive SCORE with a spread that small. You're going to have to spread like 1-100 or back count it.
    The Cash Cow.

  8. #8


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    1-100 is a huge spread especially with a 15 minimum. Thanks for input Moo321

  9. #9


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    You guys do not seem to realize that playing the 6:5 shit games makes you part of the problem.
    G Man

  10. #10


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    I'm aware, but if it's beatable then I'm all ears. Heck I don't even like playing H soft 17.

  11. #11


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    It's beatable for pennies. Get real. Who wants to play a BJ game with a HE over 2% ? Those who like to write on open boards but barely set foot in a casino.
    G Man

  12. #12


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Thanks G Man. Someone once said "well how often do you get blackjack anyway? Although we get them, but not sure when we sit down and play we rely on them specifically. Had me thinking maybe we do have a shot at beating this 6:5 shit game.

  13. #13


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    You get a BJ on average every 21 hands or close to 4 times per hour, say 100 hands.
    If you flat bet $100 you'll get paid about $600 (3:2) instead of $480 (6:5)
    On a game with 0.5% HE, where you are suppose to lose on average $50/100 rounds (this of course includes the BJ payments), you are now giving away an additional $120 for a net loss of $170
    Now, how can anyone with half a brain come to this conclusion: well how often do you get blackjack anyway? Although we get them, but not sure when we sit down and play we rely on them specifically.


    PS. I was very conservative here, we should consider 5 BJ/hour more than 4 and you would add $150 to the theo loss.

    Should not be doing 4 things at the same time...
    Last edited by G Man; 03-29-2024 at 12:22 PM.
    G Man

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. blackjack beatable in 2016 ?
    By Ben in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-07-2016, 04:13 AM
  2. Is electronic Blackjack beatable?
    By Blitzkrieg in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 12-18-2013, 06:12 PM
  3. spanishplayer: beatable spanish blackjack?
    By spanishplayer in forum International Scene
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-23-2007, 02:43 AM
  4. Jerky: Blackjack Switch beatable?
    By Jerky in forum Blackjack Main
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-07-2007, 07:26 AM
  5. Praying Mantis: Is Blackjack Switch Beatable?
    By Praying Mantis in forum Blackjack Main
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-06-2007, 11:51 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.