-In order to win money, you need to be able to play. In order to play, you have to ensure the casino doesn't catch you. If you take these measures they will give you more time at the table, which will enable you to win the money. In other words, we're trading EV for longevity. We're hoping to win less per hour, but make it up on volume.-
I agree so far.
-The problem is that they are not likely to be any more successful getting the money. This kind of advice can cut your win rate from 50-90% or more.-
Yes, which is why one should know the true cost of any camouflage utilized. I certainly wouldn't do all at the same time nor any all the time.
-Mind you, I never got backed off of those games where the "respectful" guys were mad at me. Including hundreds of hours on one game with a SCORE over 100. So, I wasn't actually doing anything wrong. I got in, got the money, and got out without getting caught.-
But if one is playing rated and not ratholing, the consistent long-term wins will not be tolerated forever. We know that casinos aren't used to losing. When they see that SOMEhow the player has been winning for far too long, they may not care how it was done. They may just give the boot anyway. They do not have to understand it to be nervous. Even without a card, they can make an emotional decision and just shoot first and only maybe ask questions later. I know a big bettor that got booted from my local joint and he clearly did not count. He even played craps like a wild man and still got the boot.
-There are better ways to evade casino detection. They are better because they don't involve giving up your advantage for a vague hope of longevity. These include:
-Studying the crew and finding weak pit bosses/shifts to pick on-
True, but there is still surveillance, not to mention the wins that are attributed to the player, card or not.
-Studying the common methods of game protection so that you can avoid being caught by them-
Agree
-Finding out how this casino protects its games, then designing an aggressive strategy that avoids their defenses-
Agree. I know of casinos that don't bat an eye unless black comes out. Spreading horizontally was my bread and butter there. But they always had to see me cash out and I never ratholed. I did get away with it for four years there though.
-Finding stronger games that the casino is not defending against-
I believe that I know what you are referring to. I have been kicked out of a casino along with several other people for this very thing. What is true today is not true tomorrow in my experience.
-Playing a strong game that falls into a casino's mental heuristic of how civilians play-
ABsooooooLUTEly agree.
-I'm not promising you won't get backed off. I'm saying that you will be able to play strong games, with a lowered risk of backoffs, such that you won't have to worry about occasional heat ruining your livelihood-
It is a tight-rope walk to be sure. To be honest, I am more fascinated with the camouflage aspect of the game than I am the game itself. I love the "getting away with it" part.
-There was another guy who frequently played that game. Played like a total maniac. Min to max. But the guy was so good at making it look natural that even I didn't figure out he was counting for several sessions. He just looked like a hunch player. I finally heard he got backed off, but the guy must have gotten hundreds of hours into a strong double deck game, spreading table min to max, before he finally got tossed. 6 figures in EV easily. The guy with a "respectful" 1-4 spread in green with heavy cover can't get that kind of EV playing full time for a year.-
And that guy is the "true" professional in my opinion. This whole thing is a hustle. And the whole point of hustling is to conceal abilities. But numbers don't lie. All the misdirection and insane acrobatics in the world is not going to change what they see on that screen in the long run. I do generally agree with you that your favored camouflage is much better and I am generally for it. But there is nothing wrong with a few "dumb" plays here and there at just the right time.
On raising my bet after a loss, I don't have a problem b/c I can look like I am steaming or going tilt. I do believe though it is more difficult to leave on a winning streak though. I got flat betted doing that very thing.
The only thing that I completely disagree with you on is back counting. There is only one way that I can see getting away with it. Look social. Two young guys with drinks in their hand on a busy Friday night standing behind a table while counting can be done much more effectively than one guy with his arms crossed back counting on a slow Tuesday night. The former can work if they are talking to each other constantly while laughing and looking like they are just shooting the breeze and maybe looking a little drunk. I just do not see how a lone wolf can get away with it under any circumstances.
Bookmarks