One SPOT or two SPOTS?
Finally, I conducted the sims that recreate the optimal TC from which it is convenient to play two spots instead of one.
For this analysis, I assumed a heads-up game. Speed is not taken into account. The analyzed model was:
6D,S17,DOA,DAS,SPA1,SPL3,NS,4.5/6,50 billion rounds for each of the 18 sims carried out using
CAC2 with 22 indices (
R22).
The analysis was conducted on the SCORES of three different betting spreads: 1-8, 1-12, and 1-16.
Initially, the sim uses the single-spot game. Then, the game with two spots was simulated, and starting from the third sim,
various TCs ranging from +5 to -10 were evaluated. As can be observed from the analysis, for each betting spread there is an optimal TC,
resulting in a higher SCORE than if we play two spots all the time.
Code:
One spot ALWAYS
1- 8 = 17.13
1-12 = 23.66
1-16 = 27.73
Two spots ALWAYS
1- 8 = 25.42
1-12 = 34.88
1-16 = 40.75
Two spots at TC >= +5
1- 8 = 22.76
1-12 = 28.63
1-16 = 32.12
Two spots at TC >= +4
1- 8 = 22.84
1-12 = 28.78
1-16 = 32.31
Two spots at TC >= +3
1- 8 = 23.14
1-12 = 29.20
1-16 = 32.79
Two spots at TC >= +2
1- 8 = 23.56
1-12 = 29.77
1-16 = 33.46
Two spots at TC >= +1
1- 8 = 24.30
1-12 = 30.76
1-16 = 34.60
Two spots at TC >= 0
1- 8 = 25.45
1-12 = 32.52
1-16 = 36.73
Two spots at TC >= -1
1- 8 = 26.07
1-12 = 33.59
1-16 = 38.09
Two spots at TC >= -2
1- 8 = 26.37
1-12 = 34.33
1-16 = 39.14
Two spots at TC >= -3
1- 8 = 26.53
1-12 = 34.85
1-16 = 39.89
Two spots at TC >= -4 (Optimal TC for a spread 1-8)
1- 8 = 26.54
1-12 = 35.13
1-16 = 40.37
Two spots at TC >= -5
1- 8 = 26.48
1-12 = 35.28
1-16 = 40.66
Two spots at TC >= -6
1- 8 = 26.35
1-12 = 35.32
1-16 = 40.82
Two spots at TC >= -7 (Optimal TC for a spread 1-12)
1- 8 = 26.26
1-12 = 35.34
1-16 = 40.93
Two spots at TC >= -8
1- 8 = 26.13
1-12 = 35.31
1-16 = 40.97
Two spots at TC >= -9 (Optimal TC for a spread 1-16)
1- 8 = 26.01
1-12 = 35.27
1-16 = 40.98
Two spots at TC >= -10
1- 8 = 25.91
1-12 = 35.22
1-16 = 40.97
Sincerely,
Cac
Bookmarks