One SPOT or two SPOTS?

Finally, I conducted the sims that recreate the optimal TC from which it is convenient to play two spots instead of one.
For this analysis, I assumed a heads-up game. Speed is not taken into account. The analyzed model was:
6D,S17,DOA,DAS,SPA1,SPL3,NS,4.5/6,50 billion rounds for each of the 18 sims carried out using CAC2 with 22 indices (R22).
The analysis was conducted on the SCORES of three different betting spreads: 1-8, 1-12, and 1-16.
Initially, the sim uses the single-spot game. Then, the game with two spots was simulated, and starting from the third sim,
various TCs ranging from +5 to -10 were evaluated. As can be observed from the analysis, for each betting spread there is an optimal TC,
resulting in a higher SCORE than if we play two spots all the time.

Code:
One spot ALWAYS

 1- 8 = 17.13
 1-12 = 23.66
 1-16 = 27.73

Two spots ALWAYS

 1- 8 = 25.42
 1-12 = 34.88
 1-16 = 40.75

Two spots at TC >= +5

 1- 8 = 22.76
 1-12 = 28.63
 1-16 = 32.12

Two spots at TC >= +4

 1- 8 = 22.84
 1-12 = 28.78
 1-16 = 32.31

Two spots at TC >= +3

 1- 8 = 23.14
 1-12 = 29.20
 1-16 = 32.79

Two spots at TC >= +2

 1- 8 = 23.56
 1-12 = 29.77
 1-16 = 33.46

Two spots at TC >= +1

 1- 8 = 24.30
 1-12 = 30.76
 1-16 = 34.60

Two spots at TC >= 0

 1- 8 = 25.45
 1-12 = 32.52
 1-16 = 36.73

Two spots at TC >= -1

 1- 8 = 26.07
 1-12 = 33.59
 1-16 = 38.09

Two spots at TC >= -2

 1- 8 = 26.37
 1-12 = 34.33
 1-16 = 39.14

Two spots at TC >= -3

 1- 8 = 26.53
 1-12 = 34.85
 1-16 = 39.89

Two spots at TC >= -4 (Optimal TC for a spread 1-8)

 1- 8 = 26.54
 1-12 = 35.13
 1-16 = 40.37

Two spots at TC >= -5

 1- 8 = 26.48
 1-12 = 35.28
 1-16 = 40.66

Two spots at TC >= -6

 1- 8 = 26.35
 1-12 = 35.32
 1-16 = 40.82

Two spots at TC >= -7 (Optimal TC for a spread 1-12)

 1- 8 = 26.26
 1-12 = 35.34
 1-16 = 40.93

Two spots at TC >= -8

 1- 8 = 26.13
 1-12 = 35.31
 1-16 = 40.97

Two spots at TC >= -9 (Optimal TC for a spread 1-16)

 1- 8 = 26.01
 1-12 = 35.27
 1-16 = 40.98

Two spots at TC >= -10

 1- 8 = 25.91
 1-12 = 35.22
 1-16 = 40.97
Sincerely,
Cac
Continuing with the previous analysis, in this case I have added a player at first base.
In the second position is the CAC2 player who can use the third position for the two-spot game.
The results have been very interesting as the optimal TCs moved upwards,
although they still remain in negative territory.

Code:
1) One spot ALWAYS

 spread  score    unit
 ---------------------
 1 -  8  17.61  11.582
 1 - 12  24.19  10.383
 1 - 16  28.27   9.248

2) Two spots ALWAYS

 spread  score    unit
 ---------------------
 1 -  8  25.75   8.424
 1 - 12  35.22   7.518
 1 - 16  41.08   6.673

3) Two spots at TC >= 0

 spread  score    unit
 ---------------------
 1 -  8  29.66  10.755
 1 - 12  36.94   9.090
 1 - 16  41.22   7.849

4) Two spots at TC >= -1 (Optimal TC for a spread 1-8)

 spread  score    unit
 ---------------------
 1 -  8  29.71  10.420
 1 - 12  37.40   8.885
 1 - 16  41.95   7.695

5) Two spots at TC >= -2 (Optimal TC for a spread 1-12)

 spread  score    unit
 ---------------------
 1 -  8  29.38  10.027
 1 - 12  37.47   8.644
 1 - 16  42.30   7.513

6) Two spots at TC >= -3 (Optimal TC for a spread 1-16)

 spread  score    unit
 ---------------------
 1 -  8  28.97   9.692
 1 - 12  37.39   8.431
 1 - 16  42.43   7.349

7) Two spots at TC >= -4

 spread  score    unit
 ---------------------
 1 -  8  28.50   9.404
 1 - 12  37.17   8.250
 1 - 16  42.40   7.208

8) Two spots at TC >= -5

 spread  score    unit
 ---------------------
 1 -  8  28.08   9.171
 1 - 12  36.93   8.102
 1 - 16  42.30   7.092
Enjoy!

Sincerely,
Cac