Cacarulo said “This strategy is for the case where we decide to play through the entire shoe.”
Thanks!
You are once again making a revolution in theory!Originally Posted by Cacarulo
Next time I will change your Ryzen 5700 G to 5900x so that the forum understands your true potential! By the way, how is your research on artificial intelligence and quantum computers going?
Personally, my team achieved EV +20% over online roulette.
If you need, I will provide you with the best cutting-edge research from Novosibirsk Technological University.
Last edited by Gramazeka; 02-23-2024 at 03:38 PM.
"Don't Cast Your Pearls Before Swine" (Jesus)
Thank you!
You already know what I think regarding the change of processors. We've discussed it privately.Next time I will change your Ryzen 5700 G to 5900x so that the forum understands your true potential! By the way, how is your research on artificial intelligence and quantum computers going?
That's very interesting. We'll talk about it later.Personally, my team achieved EV +20% over online roulette.
If you need, I will provide you with the best cutting-edge research from Novosibirsk Technological University.
Sincerely,
Cac
Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.
Assuming you are talking about prediction in live games you'll need more than that unless you are multi-tabling and/or covering a significant % of the numbers to flatten the Kelly divisor.
Variance is high and the game is slow. You won't be betting every spin either.
Roulette prediction teams tend to fall apart for psychological/practical reasons despite the large theoretical advantage. I would focus on the former rather than the latter.
Last edited by Archvaldor; 02-24-2024 at 02:35 AM.
This may amuse you. My eyes. "Approximate calculations yield an advantage of 15%" - Thorp.
Worth mentioning there are many wheel of furtune type games which are highly predictable when the procedures are off. If you can do roulette that is a picnic.
Is there another Novosibirsk in Ukraine? “Novosibirsk is the largest city and administrative centre of Novosibirsk Oblast and the Siberian Federal District in Russia.”
EV +20% over online roulette belittles blackjack. How can it be? I saw a thread here about Norm and his roulette software. So maybe roulette is better than bj. 007 played roulette but never blackjack.
This may shock you. The representation of casino gambling in the Bond movies is something less than clinically accurate.
A 20% edge at roulette is not necessarily better than blackjack. Imagine you had a 20% edge on a single number (this actually is not hard to find if you know how to located a biased wheel). The EV is mugh higher than any blackjack game.
However because of the high probability of a loss on each spin you must bet much more conservatively than you would at blackjack. Almost 27 times less in fact. And roulette can be very slow. If you get in only half the number of spins that you would hands with blackjack you would be better off counting cards. Especially when you consider the greater difficulty quantifying your edge.
Roulette would be much better than blackjack, IF you can get an edge on multiple numbers of the wheel as this allows you to increase your bets with the same risk of ruin.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks