See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: 7,7 vs 8 with Surrender

  1. #1
    Senior Member dalmatian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    299


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    7,7 vs 8 with Surrender

    For halves I'm getting the following in a surrender shoe game:

    Counts below +2: Hit the 7,7 vs 8

    Count +2 through +8: Split the 7,7 vs 8

    Count +9 and above: Surrender the 7,7 vs 8

    Is there a special name for hands that actually have 3 decisions not just 2 over the full spectrum of counts?

    the only other situation I can think of is 16 vs 7 where the following is true for halves:

    Counts below +9: Hit 16 vs 7

    Counts +9 through +11: Stand 16 vs 7

    Counts +12 and above: Surrender 16 vs 7

  2. #2
    Senior Member dalmatian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    299


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    another surrender question.

    Most places nowadays are giving 17 vs A in H17 as an always surrender play (church charts from Colin Jones' Blackjack apprenticeship & Norm Wattenberger's Casino Verite). However, in professional blackjack Stanford Wong says to treat it as a reverse +2 indice. As in surrender in counts below +2 and at +2 and above stand.

    What is correct?

  3. #3


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    It's correct to surrender only when the TC < +2 and to stand if the TC >=+2.

    Don

  4. #4
    Senior Member dalmatian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    299


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by DSchles View Post
    It's correct to surrender only when the TC < +2 and to stand if the TC >=+2.

    Don
    Thanks Don. This was my fear, to be surrendering in positive counts with large bets out when in fact the correct play is not surrendering. If it was the other way around I wouldn't mind as much playing the slightly less optimal play when I have small bets out

  5. #5


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by dalmatian View Post
    For halves I'm getting the following in a surrender shoe game:

    Counts below +2: Hit the 7,7 vs 8

    Count +2 through +8: Split the 7,7 vs 8

    Count +9 and above: Surrender the 7,7 vs 8

    Is there a special name for hands that actually have 3 decisions not just 2 over the full spectrum of counts?

    the only other situation I can think of is 16 vs 7 where the following is true for halves:

    Counts below +9: Hit 16 vs 7

    Counts +9 through +11: Stand 16 vs 7

    Counts +12 and above: Surrender 16 vs 7
    I believe that for Halves, the LS index is a bit higher, between +12 and +13.
    By the way, these indices are for DAS. If NDAS, you should never split but LS with +9 or more.

    For 16v7 you STAND if the index is +9 and LS if it's +13 or more.
    Perhaps someone can confirm it.

    Sincerely,
    Cac
    Last edited by Cacarulo; 02-01-2024 at 06:00 AM.
    Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.

Similar Threads

  1. early surrender vs 10, late surrender vs A,house edge is?
    By kk7778 in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 11-05-2020, 01:53 AM
  2. Replies: 18
    Last Post: 03-30-2017, 04:24 PM
  3. 7up: 15 > T, should I hit or surrender?
    By 7up in forum Blackjack Main
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-15-2006, 06:46 PM
  4. 7up: When should we surrender against 7?
    By 7up in forum Blackjack Main
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 01-16-2006, 07:28 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.