Using Uston APC

[variance.junky]

Dear fellow members,

I got a simple question just need confirmation for me to be sure being correct

Generally speaking in a shoe game it is advised to divide 1st. 50% to divide by whole decks. Then 2nd halve use halve decks

Uston APC uses halve deck conversion.I agree to use the first 50% of the shoe whole deck conversion.

My confusion is when using whole decks in the beginning, should I then multiply the deviation numbers deciding to stand,hit, double or split times 2.

Thanks for hitting my brainwaves with the right answer at forehand ??

[Gramazeka]

https://www.blackjackinfo.com/commun...uestions.9666/

https://www.blackjackinfo.com/commun...ounting.14297/

[moo321]

When making playing or betting decisions, you always turn the running count into the true count. So, you divide the running count by the number of decks remaining.

[variance.junky]

Thank you for your help

[variance.junky]

Thank you for your reply

My question should be better I think. I know about that. But the first 50% of the shoe should be done by whole decks according the experienced out there then the second part of the shoe we use 1/2 deck estimation. if I do this what does that mean for my deviation numbers doing it this way dividing by whole decks the first 50% of the shoe? Must I multiply the integers x2 the first 50% of the deck? Thanks you and wishfully you are doing fine over there!

[DSchles]

Thank you for your reply

My question should be better I think. I know about that. But the first 50% of the shoe should be done by whole decks according the experienced out there then the second part of the shoe we use 1/2 deck estimation. if I do this what does that mean for my deviation numbers doing it this way dividing by whole decks the first 50% of the shoe? Must I multiply the integers x2 the first 50% of the deck? Thanks you and wishfully you are doing fine over there!

You're misunderstanding. You don't divide by half decks remaining. Rather, you use half-deck resolution, which means you divide by 3.5, and 4.5. Don't change anything with your indices.

Don

[variance.junky]

Ok understood! Awesome!