They don't have a UK distributor, and charge almost as much as the book for delivery to the UK. I have tried some large London bookstores including Foyles and they don't hold it.Originally Posted by Ole
I have created a new strategy in CV for ENHC surrender pairs: The changes to the existing SWong HiLo for ENHC MultiDeck charts are as follows:
88 vs 10 treated as 16 vs 10. i.e. will surrender vs 10 if available
77 vs 10 treated as 14 vs 10 i.e. will surrender vs 10 on a TC >=3 if available when using the F4
The rest of the ENHC rules were correct.
However, when saving and selecting the strategy with ENHC selected, the overrides don't show. 88 vs 10 is still showing as hit. I have attached the screenshots.
overrides.jpg
incorrect surrender for pairs.jpg
Are you sure Don about this? For 6D,ENHC,SPL3,LS I'm getting "-1" for the surrender index.
Note that BS says to surrender.
Sincerely,Code:77vT Standing = -57.16568050051265% Hitting = -51.49131857625893% Doubling = -103.48841730862026% Splitting = -77.95618196166794% Surrender = -50.00000000000000% +------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+---+---+ | TC | Probability | Standing | Hitting | Doubling | Splitting | 1 | 2 | +------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+---+---+ | 13 | 0.00004918113987484 | -0.65513586054665640 | -0.65934054854100166 | -1.31868109708200332 | -1.02193424391275012 | R | S | | 12 | 0.00009528802310021 | -0.64747235150598414 | -0.64934898184126144 | -1.29869796368252288 | -1.00140411367157944 | R | S | | 11 | 0.00022030456054112 | -0.64001098074574470 | -0.63936413224542776 | -1.27872826449085553 | -0.98139342340944513 | R | H | | 10 | 0.00044669488001704 | -0.63277116256821120 | -0.62919101392171628 | -1.25838202784343256 | -0.96193791595236233 | R | H | | 9 | 0.00090553571132447 | -0.62573725653321011 | -0.61895342704953493 | -1.23790685409906986 | -0.94297157417124078 | R | H | | 8 | 0.00178681713232004 | -0.61891112760837086 | -0.60856387415778357 | -1.21712774831556714 | -0.92446077254030878 | R | H | | 7 | 0.00335585576980620 | -0.61231405986982934 | -0.59810285047958911 | -1.19620570095917822 | -0.90647414105315383 | R | H | | 6 | 0.00609790085803137 | -0.60608417010786686 | -0.58768992338332937 | -1.17537984676665874 | -0.88939011271705015 | R | H | | 5 | 0.01121562142596041 | -0.60002300190805447 | -0.57714614292388289 | -1.15429228584776578 | -0.87265978958217516 | R | H | | 4 | 0.01974806127380787 | -0.59427633876367858 | -0.56654211701101520 | -1.13308423402203040 | -0.85666167631921109 | R | H | | 3 | 0.03473402679886555 | -0.58879320354071274 | -0.55576086391880986 | -1.11192729487700537 | -0.84074001670161358 | R | H | | 2 | 0.06104036524316535 | -0.58363241600632176 | -0.54455111731612638 | -1.09075346264876205 | -0.82406363494080737 | R | H | | 1 | 0.11047331143280217 | -0.57867842424897409 | -0.53325336446906058 | -1.06944088781744484 | -0.80664149238712179 | R | H | | 0 | 0.23473474578323381 | -0.57369724133226663 | -0.52114911519171203 | -1.04660491979659120 | -0.78828079481625535 | R | H | | -1 | 0.21114571608455926 | -0.56978274853396793 | -0.51093442223509178 | -1.02749502336470466 | -0.77262372353259146 | R | H | | -2 | 0.13521587918273845 | -0.56582516386457538 | -0.49987741802541125 | -1.00748734803108508 | -0.75534109391477799 | | H | | -3 | 0.07350057638861991 | -0.56187320684918240 | -0.48787593187154193 | -0.98595251208147394 | -0.73684062971725206 | | H | +------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+---+---+
Cac
You seem to be referring to ES, but I didn't see anything in the discussion that mentioned that. When the OP said he'd normally surrender 14 vs. T at +3, that was further evidence to me that he was talking about late surrender.
More importantly, did you get the book?
Don
I was referring to LS and unfortunately I didn't get the book yetYou seem to be referring to ES, but I didn't see anything in the discussion that mentioned that. When the OP said he'd normally surrender 14 vs. T at +3, that was further evidence to me that he was talking about late surrender.
More importantly, did you get the book?
Don
Sincerely,
Cac
The late surrender EV = -.5388, not -.5. Why? If dealer has BJ player cannot surrender and loses 1 unit. Player can surrender if dealer doesn't have BJ in which case loss = .5 units.
Early surrender EV = -.5 since player can surrender whether or not dealer has BJ.
My approximate indexes at various pens:
A graph of the values would likely smoothen the values a little by use of interpolation.
************************************************** ****************************************
7-7 versus 10, 6 decks ENHC (LS = late surrender, ES = early surrender)
************************************************** ****************************************Code:Cards remaining (before up card) LS (after up card) ES (after up card) 286 = 5 1/2 decks RC >= +13; TC ~ 2.4 RC >= -7; TC ~ -1.3 260 = 5 decks RC >= +11; TC ~ +2.2 RC >= -7; TC ~ -1.4 208 = 4 decks RC >= +9; TC ~ +2.3 RC >= -5; TC ~ -1.3 156 = 3 decks RC >= +7; TC ~ +2.3; RC >= -4; TC ~ -1.3 104 = 2 decks RC >= +5; TC ~ +2.5; RC >= -2; TC ~ -1.0 52 = 1 deck RC >= +3; TC ~ +3; RC >= -1; TC ~ -1 26 = 1/2 deck RC >= +2; TC ~ +4; RC >= 0; TC ~ 0
Not to disparage TC but the goalposts are movable when a constant TC index is assumed as statistically best.
I just included a couple of pages on my website to show this graphically using overall EV for HiLo and KO where graphs for RC and TC are generated from the exact same data.
http://www.bjstrat.net/HiLo_oev_6D_S17_NDAS_Sp1.html
http://www.bjstrat.net/KO_oev_6D_S17_NDAS_Sp1.html
k_c
Posting Permissions
-*-
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks