Ace – Five Count System: Two Indexes vs One Results in Higher Cost Play ???

[Norm]

See which has a higher SCORE. It may be that with your settings once produces more risk.

[SteinMeister]

See which has a higher SCORE. It may be that with your settings once produces more risk.

Thanks Norm and Don for responding.

CVCX shows the SCORE is zero on all accounts:

Basic Strategy, Ace-Five Count, NO indices: Win/Hr = $-4.19 SCORE = 0

Basic Strategy, Ace-Five Count, 16v10 index only: Win/Hr = $-3.54 SCORE = 0

Basic Strategy, Ace-Five Count, 9v3 index only: Win/Hr = $-4.03 SCORE = 0

Basic Strategy, Ace-Five Count, both 16v10 & 9v3 indices: Win/Hr = $-3.61 SCORE = 0

(I have not yet worked up the insurance analysis (good tip, thanks Don)).

It appears to me that since all scenarios (above) resulting in the SCORE = 0, and that despite the counter-intuitiveness of it all, the best strategy is (in this case) a sole 16v10 index hit<0 is more advantageous than combining it with a 9v3 DD >= 0.

Regards,
SteinMeister