You seem to have done extensive studies on Hi-Lo vs KO. Someone recently told me that KO is more sensitive to counting mistakes than Hi-Lo. Is this true? Did you ever run simulations to compare the cost of counting mistakes between the two systems?

I believe CVData can simulate betting errors. Does the software randomly adjust the bet upwards or downwards by a few TC or RC bins or does it randomly adjust the running count by +/- 3? There is a difference between the two approaches.

MJ