See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 27 to 39 of 63

Thread: Is it worth?!, help for a newbie (europe)

  1. #27


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by aceside View Post
    According to Norm qfit, though.
    Original Bets & Busted Only – OBBO means that if you split, the original bet will always be lost and the split hand will be lost if it busts. Double down bets are not lost.
    Read it again, carefully.

  2. #28


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Freightman View Post
    Read it again, carefully.
    Why do you bother respodning to this troll, who gets his jollies by reading responses to his never-ending errors and misinformation?

    I thought Norm banned him permanently, but apparently had a change of heart.

  3. #29


    0 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    What are you two talking about? I have read very carefully into Norm’s definition. The OBBO should be worse than OBO for the player. The OBO should be close to the US rule of dealer peeking for blackjack but it is still slightly different because usually there is no surrender upon a dealer ace upcard in OBO.
    Last edited by aceside; 11-12-2023 at 06:28 PM.

  4. #30
    Senior Member dalmatian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    299


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    I have feels this is the croatians blackjack game in Spilt. I hear that they cheatings. They add 5s to the deck when you turn your head away. I do not like play this games.

    Are you fellow European?

  5. #31


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by G Man View Post
    It's not practical nor desirable to learn every nuances you mentioned. Choose an index order that fits the most the conditions you are usuallly encountering and use the index from the tables mentioned in my previous post.
    Dear G Man, I have another question, what could I do with the 8.8 vs T in table 51.1? Which is for an ENHC where all bets are lost if the dealer has a natural. Wong in Professesional Balckjack (1994) mentions: "If you lose all to a natural by the dealer and thus will not split 8-8 against 10, then for 8-8 against 10 use -5,..." (p. 90) Which is more or less the equivalent of the -6 index of Don and Dave (2023, t. 51.1) Of course, Wong's -5 index is for 4 decks and does not specify if it is for DAS. In Wong's table (1994, p. 91 t. 32) in the case that the rules are OBO or OBBO the Early Surrender It would be -2, but what would be the equivalent index for my case where I have ES10, DAS, 6D and OBBO.

    Excuse my English, I only speak Spanish, I'm from Perú and thanks in advance for your answers.

  6. #32


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Gronbog View Post
    The bonuses are worth 20% in promo chips with each spot hitting every four rounds on average when you bet exactly $25 or $50. That makes it 5% in promo chips overall. As I said above, the promo chips are worth anywhere from almost half their value to almost their full value depending on how you play them. So almost 2.5% to almost 5% of additional EV resulting in a healthy player advantage.

    Am I misunderstanding this?
    Nope. Your analysis is spot on. I don't think he can use the funny chips on other game but BJ. So it adds 2.5% to his EV.

  7. #33


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by dalmatian View Post
    I have feels this is the croatians blackjack game in Spilt. I hear that they cheatings. They add 5s to the deck when you turn your head away. I do not like play this games.

    Are you fellow European?
    I read from some other forums that there is a new cheat called 6/6.5D scheme. Basically casino adds 2/3/4/5 of the 7th deck to the 6D BJ. If the deviation play became inaccurate most of the times and the RC or TC in the end of the shoe tends to be more volatile or higher than normal, players should be alerted that small cards like 5's have been added. Even just small amount of cards will change the game dramatically.

  8. #34


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Softhony View Post
    Dear G Man, I have another question, what could I do with the 8.8 vs T in table 51.1? Which is for an ENHC where all bets are lost if the dealer has a natural. Wong in Professesional Balckjack (1994) mentions: "If you lose all to a natural by the dealer and thus will not split 8-8 against 10, then for 8-8 against 10 use -5,..." (p. 90) Which is more or less the equivalent of the -6 index of Don and Dave (2023, t. 51.1) Of course, Wong's -5 index is for 4 decks and does not specify if it is for DAS. In Wong's table (1994, p. 91 t. 32) in the case that the rules are OBO or OBBO the Early Surrender It would be -2, but what would be the equivalent index for my case where I have ES10, DAS, 6D and OBBO.
    Thanks to G Man for bringing this question to my attention.

    Because -6 is the index to surrender 8,8 vs T for 6D DAS ES, the whole matter of ENHC vs OBO vs OBBO is irrelevant. The index applies in all cases.

    [edit]; Hmmmm scratch that. See below
    Last edited by Gronbog; 12-30-2023 at 10:57 AM. Reason: Indicate that conclusion is possibly incorrect

  9. #35


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Disregard my previous post. In the case of OBO, the ES index for surrendering 8,8 vs T will certainly be higher than -6 because the value of splitting is much higher for OBO than it is for ENHC. So much so that splitting is preferred over hitting. The index for OBBO may also be affected, but it depends on whether OBBO calls for splitting vs hitting. I don't have an answer for that offhand.

  10. #36


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Gronbog View Post
    Disregard my previous post. In the case of OBO, the ES index for surrendering 8,8 vs T will certainly be higher than -6 because the value of splitting is much higher for OBO than it is for ENHC. So much so that splitting is preferred over hitting. The index for OBBO may also be affected, but it depends on whether OBBO calls for splitting vs hitting. I don't have an answer for that offhand.
    That is correct. It is very different for American rules than for European rules. For example, for 88 vs T, there are 2 indices (Hi-Lo):

    If DAS is allowed, the index is -1; however, if NDAS, the index is -2. I am sure that in PBJ, the calculated index is for NDAS.

    Another interesting index to analyze is 88 vs 9. In this case, the indices are as follows: +12 for DAS and +8 for NDAS.
    Hope this helps.

    Sincerely,
    Cac
    Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.

  11. #37


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Cac, am I correct that your post refers to the typical North American hole card game or OBO for no hole card games?

    The OP still needs an index for no hole card OBO games, if you have the time. Specifically 6D DAS ES10 OBBO

  12. #38


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Gronbog View Post
    Cac, am I correct that your post refers to the typical North American hole card game or OBO for no hole card games?

    The OP still needs an index for no hole card OBO games, if you have the time. Specifically 6D DAS ES10 OBBO
    Yes, my indices are for the typical North American game with one card face up and one (hole card) face down. Unfortunately, I don't have indices for OBBO.

    Sincerely,
    Cac
    Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.

  13. #39


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Gronbog View Post
    Cac, am I correct that your post refers to the typical North American hole card game or OBO for no hole card games?

    The OP still needs an index for no hole card OBO games, if you have the time. Specifically 6D DAS ES10 OBBO
    I think the index for OBBO should be positioned between the OBO index (-1) and the ENHC index (-6).
    If this is correct, my index for 88vT would be -3. Of course, I need someone to confirm this.

    Sincerely,
    Cac
    Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Hello all, I am a newbie from europe
    By Justin-credible in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 07-31-2022, 08:48 PM
  2. Counting in Europe
    By Grobbelaar in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-26-2020, 12:52 PM
  3. newbie-newbie-doo: Hi-Lo question
    By newbie-newbie-doo in forum Blackjack Beginners
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-02-2005, 10:16 PM
  4. newbie-newbie-doo: Back-counting question
    By newbie-newbie-doo in forum Blackjack Beginners
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-02-2005, 12:04 AM
  5. newbie-newbie-doo: multiparameter systems
    By newbie-newbie-doo in forum Computing for Counters
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-23-2005, 12:10 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.