Originally Posted by
Cacarulo
Perfect! If "-4" is the index with which you get the best SCORE, it means it's also risk-averse.
I had calculated "-3", so I assume it should be correct as an EV-maximizer. Something you can check is the following:
See what IBA (flat bet) you get with "-3" and with "-4". The one with the better EV will be the EV-maximizer.
Hope this helps.
Sincerely,
Cac
Thanks Cac for the recommendation. I placed the flat bet at $100 to be able to see the profit per hour since I couldn't find a difference in the EV and I obtained the following. Could it be that the index will actually be located at -2 due to having a higher IBA? Or should I only compare those with higher SCORE? I included the simulation in my drive when the index is -1 to also compare it.
Code:
88 vs T Sim 2*10^10 P. 5.50/6 Spread 1-16 ($10-$160) S17 DOA DAS RSA SPL3 ES10 OBBO
+-------+--------+---------+--------+-------+--------+-------+-------+--------+---------+----------+
| Index | EV | Win/Rnd | ROR | DI | SCORE | CE | N0 | IBA | Win/Rnd | Win/Hour |
+-------+--------+---------+--------+-------+--------+-------+-------+--------+---------+----------+
| -1 | 2.297% | 0.64 | 13.50% | 12.51 | 156.39 | 31.83 | 6,394 | 0.085% | 0.08 | 8.49 |
| -2 | 2.321% | 0.62 | 13.50% | 12.54 | 157.31 | 31.07 | 6,357 | 0.086% | 0.09 | 8.60 |
| -3 | 2.327% | 0.62 | 13.40% | 12.55 | 157.39 | 31.09 | 6,353 | 0.086% | 0.09 | 8.58 |
| -4 | 2.322% | 0.63 | 13.60% | 12.55 | 157.55 | 31.12 | 6,347 | 0.086% | 0.09 | 8.57 |
| -5 | 2.320% | 0.62 | 13.50% | 12.54 | 157.18 | 31.04 | 6,362 | 0.086% | 0.09 | 8.59 |
| -6 | 2.329% | 0.62 | 13.40% | 12.55 | 157.50 | 31.11 | 6,349 | 0.086% | 0.09 | 8.61 |
| R | 2.323% | 0.62 | 13.40% | 12.55 | 157.45 | 31.10 | 6,351 | 0.085% | 0.08 | 8.46 |
+-------+--------+---------+--------+-------+--------+-------+-------+--------+---------+----------+
Bookmarks