Please don't construe my questions as an attack on your methodology. My intent was not to question the validity of your methods (and those of others), but rather to ask questions about these methods in an effort to understand them better. With a better understanding of what we all do, a more focused investigation of the source of any differences can be made.
I appreciate that we all have worked hard on our software over many years and that we do not necessarily want to divulge the details of algorithms that we have created and tested over the course of that time. I also appreciate the details which have been posted nonetheless. There's a lot here to consider and I will be reading each post carefully over the course of the next few days.
Bookmarks