Hi-Lo plus perfect insurance

[Norm]

Of course I agree and agree. These back of the envelop estimations were brilliantly conceived. But, when you think of all the variables today; they are more like the back of a stack of envelops.

[Cacarulo]

I believe that none of these statistical parameters should be underestimated. All of them have a close relationship with SCORE. Without them, the systems we have today could never have been designed. And because we have these systems we can use a tool like SCORE to compare them.
The important thing is that PE, BC and IC are the first filters. If the system does not pass these filters, why should we worry about SCORE? For example, why are we going to analyze a system whose BC is equal to 0.10? or with a low PE?
Of the three parameters mentioned, there is one that is VERY outdated and needs an immediate update. That's what we've been working with Zenfighter for a while now. It is very important to talk about an PE that works for shoes and that involves more real plays than the 71 used by Griffin.

Sincerely,
Cac

[Cacarulo]

This is compatible on a computer, but not in real life. But if we are using a computer, then I would replace Halves with RAPC 71.

I started a new thread.

Cac