PE, IC, BC and SCORE
The following examples demonstrate the direct relationship that exists between these parameters.
We all know that one of the most hardest systems to beat is HO2/A. Let's use for this comparative
study the following conditions: 6D,S17,DOA,DAS,SPA1,SPL3,NS,4.5/6,R22 indices and 50 billion rounds each.
Let's leave IC aside for now as insurance is included in the PE calculation. Let us take only PE and BC.
Based on the conditions mentioned above, HO2 in shoes has a PE equal to 0,7269. BC is equal to 0,9131 but
if we use a side count of aces the value becomes 0,9798.
Let us also consider another system with a high efficiency such as the TEN count. In this case the PE is
equal to 0,7039 less than HO2.
HO2/A therefore has a PE of 0.7269 and a BC of 0.9798. Taking these parameters into account, what is the SCORE of this system?
1-12: 25.53
1-16: 29.74
It is expected that any increase in any of these two parameters should increase the SCORE. If we hold HO2 for the strategy
but increase the BC of 0,9798 using a higher BC system like HALVES or RAPC71, what SCORE would we get? Let's see.
a) HALVES has a BC equal to 0.9930
b) RAPC71 has a BC equal to 0.9944
a) HO2 (0,7269) + HALVES (0,9930)
1-12: 25.63
1-16: 29.81
b) HO2 (0,7269) + RAPC71 (0,9944)
1-12: 25.70
1-16: 29.89
We can clearly see that an increase in BC increases the SCORE proportionally. If instead of the BC we increased the PE,
we would also obtain a better SCORE.
Let's see what happens in example a) if instead of using HO2 we use the TEN count in its balanced form:
c) TEN (0,7039) + HALVES (0,9930)
1-12: 25.36
1-16: 29.51
As PE decreases, SCORE also decreases.
Sincerely,
Cac
Bookmarks