I need your opinion ....

[stefan]

The target of my post is someone to run a sim with unshuffled decks and apply basic strategy and card counting based spread.

Freight man thanks 4 your answer. I also agree that first base is somehow different than others in a situation like that.but when we say unshuffled decks against basic strategy i mean not to play knowing the next card that will come out even if we know it

Cacarulo nice to get your correct nickname.

Your post was before some years In a thread about clumping. U had done as a home experiment to play bs and spread against a shoe of 6decks unshuffled and u had hit as I remember fast neg swings.

[Cacarulo]

The target of my post is someone to run a sim with unshuffled decks and apply basic strategy and card counting based spread.

Freight man thanks 4 your answer. I also agree that first base is somehow different than others in a situation like that.but when we say unshuffled decks against basic strategy i mean not to play knowing the next card that will come out even if we know it

Cacarulo nice to get your correct nickname.

Your post was before some years In a thread about clumping. U had done as a home experiment to play bs and spread against a shoe of 6decks unshuffled and u had hit as I remember fast neg swings.

Hi Stefan,

The key is the word "unshuffled". I could run a simulation with a "poor shuffle" and get an "A" result. This would make you happy but then I could run another simulation with another "poor shuffle" and get an "B" result totally different from "A" result.
What do we do in this case? Would you stay with "A" or with "B"? Do you understand where I want to go? In addition to being unrealistic, the simulation itself would tell us absolutely nothing.

Sincerely,
Cac