I have wanted to start a new thread about how to set a sound expectation for the BJ game as an AP, meant to be a follow-up and closely related threat to my another thread entitled 'Define disciplilne' (http://www.blackjacktheforum.com/showthread.php?4387-Define-discipline, although quite a few posts under which deviated to a different topic). Related to setting an appropriate expectation for the game, I think the following was well said (in one of Tthree's posts that could be found at
http://www.blackjacktheforum.com/showthread.php?4496-Being-happy-about-gaining-EV&p=37034#post37034):
I may still have many questions around this topic, but I'd like to ask the following (I hope) simpler questions first: Is it worth spending so much time and effort in this game that has such a tiny mathematical edge (assuming you are only counting)? Is the expectation really (or should the expectation be) on winning $, or how much weight of the expectation does one typically (or should one) put on winning $ vs entertainment? I suppose the game could be very lucrative 20 (or 10) years ago, but is it still the case nowadays? As I gather, as long as you don't aim too high (which is unrealistic anyway given the tiny edge you have in the game), then you'll be in an easier position to be disciplined. Still, it's kind of hard to NOT GAMBLE in the game as (I think) also implied by some other posts from pros or experienced AP's (suggesting occasional super max bets 30-50% above the max bets). BTW, if the super max bets are still within the mathematically sound range (such as <= 1% of the bankroll), why were they not set as the max bets in the first place? What's the difference between them? It looks like I still couldn't help asking many questions. Ok, I'll stop here for now.
Bookmarks