Taking neutral card into account

[bjanalyst]

Of course, you know what's coming next. Fearing that Cac may have missed something about his count, bjanalyst is going to repost everything he has ever written on the subject, just to make sure that Cac gets it.

And he will justify his verbal torrent by prefacing it by saying, "someone asked a question, so I have an obligation to answer."

Wait for it!

Don

I will make my reply shorter than your post.

1. (1/2)*7m9c is added to HL for betting
2. 7m9c is added to HL for six simple top 6 plays (as compared to 18 deviations for the Illustrious 18)
3. For all other plays, stand-alone HL is used.

[Norm]

If this continues, I'll erase "7m9c" from every post on the forum.

[bjanalyst]

In a nutshell - I use EBJ 2 ( 1/2), which is really easy for a Hi Lo player, with the same indexes, where the side count is instantly added to the running count. Let's say this gives an increase of 10%, I did not count exactly, but there is an increase and this is obvious. He uses a modified Silver Fox, where there is a separate side count, which, let's say, gives an increase of 11% from Hi Lo, but damnably messes up the head. So it turns out that he is fighting for 1% of my system, while not taking into account the parameters of speed and simplicity. He writes whole books of 700 pages about it. I put it in two words-

I use modified Hi Lo + 7+ 9.

7= + 0.5.
9 = -0.5.
It’s EBJ 2 count= RPC. Indexes = Hi Lo.

Post #5 explained HL w 7m9c on one page and keeping two simple level one counts, HL and 7m9c, is easy.

Gronbog actually listed the SCOREs separately for betting, playing top 6 only and betting and playing together.

Six decks, 5 decks dealt, Late Surrender, Back-Count 1-8
.................................SCORE....Increase over HL Full
HiLo Full......................88.18
HiLo+7m9c-p top 6.......91.05....3.2%
HiLo+7m9c-b...............92.88....5.3%
HiLo+7m9c-b-p top 6....95.66....8.5%
HiOpt II + ASC........... 102.08...15.8%


p = playing deviations with top 6 only
b = betting only
b-p = betting plus playing with top 6

[iCountNTrack]

If this continues, I'll erase "7m9c" from every post on the forum.

I say aye

[bjanalyst]

I say aye

I am not even going to reply even with just a few polite factual clarifying sentences to any more insulting posts.

So this will not be a problem again. It is not worth replying when insulted.

[21forme]

I am not even going to reply

From dictionary.com:
Definition of reply
verb (used without object), re·plied, re·ply·ing.
to make answer in words or writing; answer; respond:
to reply to a question.
to respond by some action, performance, etc.:
to reply to the enemy's fire.



Uh, so what do you call post #57?

[bjanalyst]

From dictionary.com:
Definition of reply
verb (used without object), re·plied, re·ply·ing.
to make answer in words or writing; answer; respond:
to reply to a question.
to respond by some action, performance, etc.:
to reply to the enemy's fire.



Uh, so what do you call post #57?

I said I would not reply to INSULTING posts like my reply in post 53.
Post #57 was not in reply to an insulting post.

[Norm]

Thread closed.