Correlation coefficients & simulations

[bejammin075]

Tarzan,

Not sure if you'll see this. I was going through threads I missed, and in the 900+ long bjanalyst/AA78mTc thread (sorry if that brings bad flashbacks for people) you asked

the difference in EV can be as little as .0001 between three possible playing decisions, to either hit, split, or double given the right deck composition, which will have virtually no impact on a simulation, but is still just a hell of a lot of fun if you are hardcore enough. Can you guess the hand?

And nobody had the correct answer which has to be 4,4 v 3. I'll collect my prize now.

[Gramazeka]

I have lost contact with both of them. I have tried known email addresses, but to no avail. No, they don't read or participate in this forum or any other, to my knowledge. Two of the great minds of the game. Pity.

Don

I'm in touch with Zenfighter. What to convey? ))

[Gramazeka]

And nobody had the correct answer which has to be 4,4 v 3. I'll collect my prize now.

This?

[DSchles]

I'm in touch with Zenfighter. What to convey? ))

1. How is he doing?
2. Does he know how to contact Cacarulo? Old email address doesn't respond.

Thanks.

Don

[Gramazeka]

1. How is he doing?
2. Does he know how to contact Cacarulo? Old email address doesn't respond.

Thanks.

Don

I recently got in touch with Zenfighter via WhatsApp. He was all right. I will ask him to contact you.

[DSchles]

I recently got in touch with Zenfighter via WhatsApp. He was all right. I will ask him to contact you.

Thank you!

Don

[bejammin075]

This?

Yeah. At a higher TC, the EV of both doubling and splitting start to become larger than EV for hitting, around the same TC.

What’s the software you are using? Is it a CA or simulator? Looks very interesting but I can’t read Cyrillic. Did you write the code?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[G Man]

I recently got in touch with Zenfighter via WhatsApp. He was all right. I will ask him to contact you.

I also did try to reach him a certain number of times with no answer to his (old?) email address...
I would appreciate if someone could provide me with his (new?) email address via PM
Thanks!

[Gramazeka]

Yeah. At a higher TC, the EV of both doubling and splitting start to become larger than EV for hitting, around the same TC.

What’s the software you are using? Is it a CA or simulator? Looks very interesting but I can’t read Cyrillic. Did you write the code?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This is CA. The program uses a unique brute force kernel on the final deck
, which allows ABSOLUTELY accurately, and most importantly, very quickly to produce
calculations.

44 vs 3 Split > TC 8, Double > TC 9.2. See EV Hit, Double, split.

[Norm]

which allows ABSOLUTELY accurately

Sorry, using all caps does not bestow truth. This still ignores the cut card effect, floating advantage, and the fact that most rounds end with a high card. Be careful with words like "absolutely".

[Gramazeka]

Sorry, using all caps does not bestow truth. This still ignores the cut card effect, floating advantage, and the fact that most rounds end with a high card. Be careful with words like "absolutely".

You're right. These are not my words, but the words of the developer. But this does not affect decision-making and money in any way. By the way, I can compete with you in this regard- my CA indeces vs Verite indeces. Ok ? )) Any indeces in my soft i take 1 sek. Max TC 23 ( This is much more convenient than Verite ).

[21forme]

Sorry, using all caps does not bestow truth. This still ignores the cut card effect, floating advantage, and the fact that most rounds end with a high card. Be careful with words like "absolutely".

This is known as the aceside effect.

[Norm]

No competition regarding me as I don't use words like absolute. Ahh, but what tool claims this? I'll stick with risk-averse indices, until a better methodology appears. I just work to maximize SCORE.