See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 14 to 16 of 16

Thread: Omega II w/ A side count

  1. #14


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by UNCBear4SJ View Post
    LOL
    LOL!
    LOL!!
    LOL!!!
    LOL!!!!
    Is this one of those posts where you "intentionally" act like a moron for "entertainment" value as you claim is your motive in other threads?

    Is 26 years of successfully using a level 2 count on primarily 6 deck shoes enough evidence for you?
    I have to say that you are more advanced and a lot more experienced here. I post things based on my own perspective, but a lot of times my thoughts were not accurately delivered. I meant to say that the level two system Omega II probably is not efficient for multiple deck games because of the shortage of the ace information, but I generalized it too much to detriment other counting systems.

  2. #15


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by UncleChoo View Post
    Thanks for this! By squirrelly I was just meaning that's where mental strain starts to come in.
    I actually never tried Ao2 with 8 decks uuughh... 6 deckers were tough enough esp. if you wanted 1/2 deck TCs. My discard tray looked as follows. For example instead of dividing by 3 decks with 3 decks played i would divide by 6 >1/2 decks(12) and just double the index. Say you have a RC of +6 and divide by 3 decks you get a TC of +2 right. Same result for me by dividing by 6/6=+1 doubled =+2. Or if there is now 3 and 1/2(5/14) decks in the discard tray and you now have a RC of +13 5/13=2 3/5 x 2=+5. The number on the right is the average distribution of aces. However i only used this method for the play of hands. I actually used Bryce Carlsons "Betting Indexes" per every half deck instead of TC conversions...Just curious if you use his betting indices and how you calculate your TC?

    12/0
    11/2

    10/4
    9/6

    8/8
    7/10

    6/12
    5/14

    4/16
    3/18

    2/20
    1/22

    0/24
    Last edited by Jack Jackson; 01-01-2022 at 05:16 AM.
    http://bjstrat.net/cgi-bin/cdca.cgi

  3. #16


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Jackson View Post
    Just curious if you use his betting indices and how you calculate your TC?
    You know I wish I could say I was using 1/2 deck estimate TC's, but I'd only be lying to myself. I'm actually calculating my TC's using full deck rounding (RC / (amount of decks left rounded to nearest full deck)).
    I'm aware this is something I will need to work on and improve upon too by practicing at least trying the 1/2 deck rounding.

    There was a time I actually memorized all the strategy deviations in Ao2 that Carlson listed in his Blackjack for Blood book.
    However, I had to step away from playing for close to a year and a half, and rather than try and memorize all those deviations again, I just retaught myself the Illustrious 18 deviations.




Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Hi-Lo system with Ace side counts and 2, 3 side count
    By BJcountingmaster in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-27-2019, 06:25 PM
  2. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 08-16-2019, 11:38 PM
  3. Matt: Omega II simulations side count ?
    By Matt in forum Blackjack Main
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-29-2008, 05:22 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-11-2008, 11:31 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.