It is not length of life, but depth of penetration

[aceside]

BJA3 chapter 6. Might pay to reread it.

Don

I would like to read into this chapter of your book soon. Before that, let me ask Norm about this. At this website Blackjack Floating Advantage (blackjackincolor.com), Norm shows that the advantage of a true count increases as the penetration depth increases for a 6-deck shoe. How was the player advantage simulated in this chart?

Also, I proved on this forum earlier that there is no floating advantage from the insurance side bet. Do you agree?

[Freightman]

Aceside said

Norm shows that the advantage of a true count increases as the penetration depth increases for a 6-deck shoe. How was the player advantage simulated in this chart?

Im sure I18 has a lot to do with it
and

Also, I proved on this forum earlier that there is no floating advantage from the insurance side bet. Do you agree?

If you proved it, no need to agree or disagree. Now, if it’s demonstrated that your conclusions were flawed, then that’s different. In math terms

=if(“aceside said it”),then(“it must be flawed”)

Been a long time - wonder if I got that right. How did you prove it, must have skipped over that one.

[aceside]

Been a long time - wonder if I got that right. How did you prove it, must have skipped over that one.

My proof is the #48 post in the thread Thread: Illustrious 18 - indexes.

[Freightman]

My proof is the #48 post in the thread Thread: Illustrious 18 - indexes.

couldn't find it. Please provide a link