Approx house edge of .65 putting you even with the house at a sliver below true 1.5.
70 hours is truly an insignificant sample size. Your graph does show number of sessions played without effort(probably 30-35). Nor does it show wins, losses and ties along with average dollars in those categories.
What it does intimate is average dollars won per session is lower than average dollars per session. It also suggests a robotic approach which ignores some of the finer nuances to the game. Further to that, an annoyance with an $1800 loss suggests a lower stakes game which further suggests potentially crowded tables. This would clearly affect hands per hour which leads to lower $win rates which causes me to seriously question win rate if $98 per hour. You can of course agree with or correct my assumptions.
No surrender takes about 1/3 off your win rate of a surrender game. 5/6 makes up for a lot of house transgressions in rules. Other issues to consider are number of max bets available with your bankroll. I haven’t bothered to figure out if your betting optimally, though it doesn’t look like it.
My suggestion would be to clearly average your hands played per hour along with number of players at the table. Use CVCX to calculate the frequency of true count buckets based in playing 5/6, and then have another look at your ramping. The other issue of course is your confidence that your playing a zero leak game. To thine own self be true.
Bookmarks