That isn't the right way to do it. When you play alone, there are two TOTAL hands, yours and the dealer's. When you play two hands alone, there are three total hands. So, the correct fraction is two-thirds, not one-half. Also, playing alone, you surely get more than 100 rounds per hour; it's at least double that. So that needs to be adjusted as well.
Don
Let me specify what I want the OP to do. Two comparisons as below:
#1. When playing two hands, set round/hour=50, and the bet spread on each hand as $25, $50…… until $300, exactly same as that in one-hand playing. This comparison does not consider the covariance between two simultaneous hands.
#2. when playing two hands, set round/hour=100, and the bet spread on each hand as $16.7, $33.3…… until $200. Now the spread ratio is the same 12 but the base amount is reduced to 2/3 of the original. This comparison considers the covariance between two simultaneous hands.
I really hope to see the results.
Email: [email protected]
I think I understand what Norm is saying now in regards to backcounting with the spread param but I think it actually can be done if you take into account how the spreads occur and when you want to start playing two hands. Might not be worth it though if it’s sub optimal anyway, I can check later when I get home.
Some things that may worth considering are the Win/Rnd, ROR, and N0 which are (mostly/entirely?) unaffected by changes in how many hands are played per hour.
I’m going to read more into BJA3 mentioned by Don and play with some scenarios with a better understanding afterwards
Last edited by ajporrasm; 09-20-2021 at 05:43 PM.
Bookmarks