Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 13 of 19

Thread: CVData basic strategy doesn't match wizard of odds for 66 vs 7 , 77 vs 8

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. 08-30-2021, 01:30 AM #1
    fwb
    fwb is offline
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    11

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    CVData basic strategy doesn't match wizard of odds for 66 vs 7 , 77 vs 8

    image.jpg
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 08-30-2021, 04:06 AM #2
    Norm
    Norm is offline
    Random number herder Norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The mote in God's eye
    Posts
    12,473
    Blog Entries
    59

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    That's Zen, not BS.
    "I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 09-01-2021, 12:37 AM #3
    fwb
    fwb is offline
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    11

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Norm View Post
    That's Zen, not BS.
    No, double deck BS shows the same mistake. Regardless, it's still the wrong move for zen.

    Untitled.jpg

    Quote Originally Posted by G Man View Post
    I think you're comparing DD, DAS strategy with "multi-deck" strategy. In this particular case, splitting 66 vs 7 and 77 vs 8 is ok for SD and DD games, any other number of decks should follow CVData Basic Strategy charts for multi-deck.
    No, unchecking multi-deck does not change it, and setup has 2 decks set. Someone verify
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 09-01-2021, 12:45 AM #4
    fwb
    fwb is offline
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    11

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Also found a type-O for you

    Attachment 4612
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 09-01-2021, 09:20 AM #5
    DSchles
    DSchles is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    5,138

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by fwb View Post
    Also found a type-O for you

    Attachment 4612
    The attachment doesn't work. And type-O is a blood type. You might mean "typo" (short for typographical error).

    Don
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 09-01-2021, 08:51 PM #6
    Gronbog
    Gronbog is offline
    Senior Member Gronbog's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,506

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by DSchles View Post
    You might mean "typo" (short for typographical error).
    The correct spelling is tupo
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 09-02-2021, 08:21 AM #7
    DSchles
    DSchles is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    5,138

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Gronbog View Post
    The correct spelling is tupo
    Write you are!

    Don
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 09-06-2021, 05:27 AM #8
    Cohiba
    Cohiba is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    179

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by DSchles View Post
    Write you are!

    Don
    Ugh think that you meant to say "Right" not "Write" you are.

    Cohiba
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 09-06-2021, 08:34 AM #9
    DSchles
    DSchles is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    5,138

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Cohiba View Post
    Ugh think that you meant to say "Right" not "Write" you are.

    Cohiba
    Thanks for the correction. Have never been much of a speller. You did see the post above mine, right (or should that be "write"?)?

    Don
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 09-01-2021, 06:16 AM #10
    G Man
    G Man is offline
    Senior Member G Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    794

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by fwb View Post
    No, unchecking multi-deck does not change it, and setup has 2 decks set. Someone verify
    Read again what Norm wrote. You are comparing Wizard's DD Basic Strategy which shows correctly that you should split 66 vs 7 and 77 vs 8 in DD games but CVData doesn't have specific DD Basic Strategy, so you are looking at multi-deck strategy in CVData even if you have DD checked.

    You will have to create your own DD BS chart in CVData to run realistic simulations.
    G Man
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 09-01-2021, 02:26 PM #11
    fwb
    fwb is offline
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    11

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by G Man View Post
    Read again what Norm wrote. You are comparing Wizard's DD Basic Strategy which shows correctly that you should split 66 vs 7 and 77 vs 8 in DD games but CVData doesn't have specific DD Basic Strategy, so you are looking at multi-deck strategy in CVData even if you have DD checked.

    You will have to create your own DD BS chart in CVData to run realistic simulations.
    Here is the built-in strategy that says Double Deck and still isn't splitting 6's against 7. What am I doing wrong?






    And here is the typo I found...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 08-30-2021, 06:11 AM #12
    G Man
    G Man is offline
    Senior Member G Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    794

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    I think you're comparing DD, DAS strategy with "multi-deck" strategy. In this particular case, splitting 66 vs 7 and 77 vs 8 is ok for SD and DD games, any other number of decks should follow CVData Basic Strategy charts for multi-deck.
    G Man
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 09-01-2021, 12:41 AM #13
    fwb
    fwb is offline
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    11

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Attachment 4611
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads

  1. Software Basic Strategy Table vs Book Basic Strategy
    By ao32 in forum Software
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-17-2020, 08:00 PM
  2. Wizard of Odds: Is the basic strategy ever wrong for the overall game?
    By Wizard of Odds in forum Theory & Math
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-31-2005, 10:51 AM
  3. double bonus randy: basic strategy for match play coupon?
    By double bonus randy in forum Blackjack Main
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-29-2003, 05:48 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules

Other QFIT Sites

Internal Links

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.