MGP CA: DD S17 DAS LS - 16 vs 9

[aceside]

Using MGP's CA to generate the total dependent strategy for DD S17 DAS LS, I get the following which matches the basic strategy generated by the basic strategy engine at

https://www.blackjackinfo.com/blackj...rr=ls&peek=yes

DD.S17.DAS.LS.jpg

However, when I click on the cell for 16 vs 9 to see the EVs, the EV of surrender is clearly the best. Why does the strategy not recommend surrender for this hand?

DD.S17.DAS.LS.withEV.jpg

I ask because, when generating the strategy for this hand by simulation using my own software, I get similar EVs and so my software does recommend surrender for this hand.

A similar situation exists for A,6 vs 2 where doubling has the best EV according to both MGP and my software, yet the strategy displayed by MGP is to hit.

What am I missing?

I think there is no problem with this. The basic strategy is R/S, depending on the rule of if surrender is allowed or not.