See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 53 to 65 of 66

Thread: Bust Bonus side bet

  1. #53


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Probability of blackjack w/up card ace = .3496
    Probability of blackjack w/up card ten = .0874

    Code:
    Dealer probabilities - 6 decks dealer stands on soft 17....
    Count tags {1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,0,0,0,1}
    Specific removals (1 - 10): {0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0}
    Subgroup removals: None
    Running count (before up card is dealt): 10   Cards remaining: 104
    
    Up card    17      18      19      20      21      BJ     BUST
       1     0.1731  0.1871  0.1880  0.1912  0.0728          0.1879
       2     0.1288  0.1221  0.1267  0.1230  0.1198          0.3795
       3     0.1221  0.1196  0.1155  0.1199  0.1165          0.4065
       4     0.1205  0.1086  0.1117  0.1093  0.1133          0.4366
       5     0.1125  0.1119  0.1081  0.1007  0.1015          0.4653
       6     0.1714  0.0951  0.0969  0.0930  0.0909          0.4528
       7     0.4002  0.1369  0.0683  0.0705  0.0666          0.2574
       8     0.1209  0.3903  0.1295  0.0609  0.0631          0.2353
       9     0.1131  0.1027  0.3846  0.1232  0.0546          0.2218
      10     0.1164  0.1138  0.1153  0.4029  0.0320          0.2196
    
    Overall  0.1483  0.1409  0.1377  0.2069  0.0691          0.2970
    
    Press u or U to display unconditional values, any other key to exit
    
    
    Dealer probabilities - 6 decks dealer hits soft 17....
    Count tags {1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,0,0,0,1}
    Specific removals (1 - 10): {0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0}
    Subgroup removals: None
    Running count (before up card is dealt): 10   Cards remaining: 104
    
    Up card    17      18      19      20      21      BJ     BUST
       1     0.0822  0.2026  0.2021  0.2055  0.0872          0.2204
       2     0.1200  0.1237  0.1280  0.1244  0.1212          0.3827
       3     0.1149  0.1208  0.1166  0.1209  0.1176          0.4092
       4     0.1128  0.1100  0.1128  0.1105  0.1144          0.4395
       5     0.1083  0.1126  0.1087  0.1014  0.1022          0.4669
       6     0.1174  0.1044  0.1053  0.1015  0.0995          0.4719
       7     0.4002  0.1369  0.0683  0.0705  0.0666          0.2574
       8     0.1209  0.3903  0.1295  0.0609  0.0631          0.2353
       9     0.1131  0.1027  0.3846  0.1232  0.0546          0.2218
      10     0.1164  0.1138  0.1153  0.4029  0.0320          0.2196
    
    Overall  0.1370  0.1429  0.1395  0.2087  0.0708          0.3011
    
    Press u or U to display unconditional values, any other key to exit
    k_c

  2. #54


    0 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    On my second thought, I prefer to treating the remaining 104-card deck as an infinite deck with your calculated probability numbers. We probably donot need to consider the dynamic variation of each card probability for now. I am actually thinking to extend this calculation to excess and deficit aces in the remaining 104 cards.

  3. #55


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by aceside View Post
    On my second thought, I prefer to treating the remaining 104-card deck as an infinite deck with your calculated probability numbers. We probably donot need to consider the dynamic variation of each card probability for now. I am actually thinking to extend this calculation to excess and deficit aces in the remaining 104 cards.
    Breaking news - the wheel has already been invented.

    Why do you make everything more complex than it needs to be (making errors in the process)?

  4. #56


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by 21forme View Post
    Breaking news - the wheel has already been invented.

    Why do you make everything more complex than it needs to be (making errors in the process)?
    There is no one wheel to fit in all wagons. That's why I keep digging into this. K_C has done a great work!

  5. #57


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by k_c View Post
    Probability of blackjack w/up card ace = .3496
    Probability of blackjack w/up card ten = .0874
    We probably do not need these two numbers to calculate the dealer bust rate. When the dealer shows an Ace up card, there are still 104 cards at the RC=+10 remaining in the shoe. This means:

    The probability of a dealer blackjack with up card ace = 0.34628, as you calculated.
    The probability of a dealer blackjack with up card ten = 0.08657, as you calculated.

    For the sake of this Bust Bonus side bet, can you use the above numbers to re-calculate the dealer bust rate after peeking?

    Also, can you extend this calculation to the case of RC=+20?

    With these two RC points, I will extrapolate to all other values because the dealer bust rate seems a linear function of TC.
    Last edited by aceside; 06-06-2022 at 02:09 PM.

  6. #58


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by aceside View Post
    The probability of a dealer blackjack with up card ace = 0.34628, as you calculated.
    The probability of a dealer blackjack with up card ten = 0.08657, as you calculated.
    It may be helpful to you if you check your math with a simple example.

    For a full single deck, probability of Ten = 16/52

    If dealer is given up card of Ace, probability of blackjack = 16/51 not 16/52.

    k_c

  7. #59


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by k_c View Post
    It may be helpful to you if you check your math with a simple example.

    For a full single deck, probability of Ten = 16/52

    If dealer is given up card of Ace, probability of blackjack = 16/51 not 16/52.

    k_c
    I’ve kind of got what you are talking about. Earlier you and Cacarulo had this same discussion on this part but I didn’t pay very much attention, so I still don’t know how to calculate the situation when a specific card is given to the dealer up card.

    If 208 cards are randomly dealt from a 6-deck shoe and the running count is +10, you’ve already calculated everything. I understand this part.

    However, if 207 cards are dealt out and an Ace card is given to the dealer up card from a 6-deck shoe, and the running count is +10, I don’t know how to calculate this anymore.

    Specifying a certain dealer’s up card will have an effect on the card probability in the remaining 104-card deck, and thus on the dealer bust rate too. I agree. Please calculate this at RC=+20. If possible, at RC=-20 too.

  8. #60


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by aceside View Post
    I’ve kind of got what you are talking about. Earlier you and Cacarulo had this same discussion on this part but I didn’t pay very much attention, so I still don’t know how to calculate the situation when a specific card is given to the dealer up card.

    If 208 cards are randomly dealt from a 6-deck shoe and the running count is +10, you’ve already calculated everything. I understand this part.

    However, if 207 cards are dealt out and an Ace card is given to the dealer up card from a 6-deck shoe, and the running count is +10, I don’t know how to calculate this anymore.

    Specifying a certain dealer’s up card will have an effect on the card probability in the remaining 104-card deck, and thus on the dealer bust rate too. I agree. Please calculate this at RC=+20. If possible, at RC=-20 too.

    My running count input is before up card is dealt. If ace or ten is up card, running count needs to be reduced by 1 to account for up card. If 7,8,9 is up card, running count is unchanged. If 2,3,4,5,6 is up card, running count needs to be increased by 1 to account for up card.

    Running count is 20 with 104 cards remaining before up card, dealer probs conditioned on no dealer blackjack
    Code:
    Count tags {1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,0,0,0,1}
    Specific removals (1 - 10): {0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0}
    No subgroup (removals) are defined
    Decks: 6 (possible input for cards remaining: 1 to 312)
    Cards remaining before up card (current = 156, no input = no change): 104
    Initial running count (full shoe): 0
    Running count (before up card is dealt, no input defaults to 0): 20
    Computing.....please wait.....
    
    Number of subsets for above conditions: 37
    Prob of running count 20 with above removals from 6 decks: 0.00129
    
    p[1] 0.09640  p[2] 0.05794  p[3] 0.05794  p[4] 0.05794  p[5] 0.05794
    p[6] 0.05794  p[7] 0.07611  p[8] 0.07611  p[9] 0.07611  p[10] 0.38559
    
    
    Dealer probabilities - 6 decks dealer stands on soft 17....
    Count tags {1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,0,0,0,1}
    Specific removals (1 - 10): {0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0}
    Subgroup removals: None
    Running count (before up card is dealt): 20   Cards remaining: 104
    
    Up card    17      18      19      20      21      BJ     BUST
       1     0.1588  0.1843  0.1878  0.1924  0.0692          0.2075
       2     0.1173  0.1101  0.1227  0.1221  0.1202          0.4076
       3     0.1104  0.1077  0.1053  0.1177  0.1175          0.4413
       4     0.1095  0.0964  0.1014  0.1009  0.1130          0.4788
       5     0.1043  0.1003  0.0979  0.0913  0.0942          0.5121
       6     0.1787  0.0838  0.0864  0.0838  0.0833          0.4841
       7     0.4317  0.1370  0.0589  0.0620  0.0594          0.2510
       8     0.1125  0.4213  0.1311  0.0530  0.0562          0.2259
       9     0.1059  0.0939  0.4168  0.1261  0.0480          0.2092
      10     0.1104  0.1065  0.1084  0.4446  0.0261          0.2040
    
    Overall  0.1440  0.1367  0.1348  0.2317  0.0607          0.2920
    
    
    Dealer probabilities - 6 decks dealer hits soft 17....
    Count tags {1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,0,0,0,1}
    Specific removals (1 - 10): {0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0}
    Subgroup removals: None
    Running count (before up card is dealt): 20   Cards remaining: 104
    
    Up card    17      18      19      20      21      BJ     BUST
       1     0.0808  0.1990  0.1987  0.2035  0.0804          0.2375
       2     0.1094  0.1116  0.1237  0.1233  0.1213          0.4108
       3     0.1040  0.1089  0.1063  0.1185  0.1185          0.4439
       4     0.1025  0.0977  0.1023  0.1020  0.1139          0.4816
       5     0.0993  0.1012  0.0986  0.0920  0.0949          0.5140
       6     0.1221  0.0946  0.0944  0.0920  0.0915          0.5055
       7     0.4317  0.1370  0.0589  0.0620  0.0594          0.2510
       8     0.1125  0.4213  0.1311  0.0530  0.0562          0.2259
       9     0.1059  0.0939  0.4168  0.1261  0.0480          0.2092
      10     0.1104  0.1065  0.1084  0.4446  0.0261          0.2040
    
    Overall  0.1338  0.1386  0.1363  0.2331  0.0622          0.2959
    k_c

  9. #61


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by k_c View Post
    My running count input is before up card is dealt. If ace or ten is up card, running count needs to be reduced by 1 to account for up card. If 7,8,9 is up card, running count is unchanged. If 2,3,4,5,6 is up card, running count needs to be increased by 1 to account for up card.

    Running count is 20 with 104 cards remaining before up card, dealer probs conditioned on no dealer blackjack
    Hi k_c,
    I made a graph to summarize your results at these two points, TC=~+5 and TC=~+10, but realized I probably stretched too much especially at negative TCs, so I deleted it. At negative TCs, the dealer bust rate should become nonlinear. Can you also help do the same calculation at TC=-10 and TC=0?

  10. #62


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by aceside View Post
    Hi k_c,
    I made a graph to summarize your results at these two points, TC=~+5 and TC=~+10, but realized I probably stretched too much especially at negative TCs, so I deleted it. At negative TCs, the dealer bust rate should become nonlinear. Can you also help do the same calculation at TC=-10 and TC=0?
    After dealer has checked for blackjack, dealer hits soft 17, RC = 0,-10,-20 before up card:
    Code:
    Dealer probabilities - 6 decks dealer hits soft 17....
    Count tags {1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,0,0,0,1}
    Specific removals (1 - 10): {0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0}
    Subgroup removals: None
    Running count (before up card is dealt): 0   Cards remaining: 104
    
    Up card    17      18      19      20      21      BJ     BUST
       1     0.0823  0.2061  0.2066  0.2082  0.0942          0.2025
       2     0.1299  0.1348  0.1323  0.1257  0.1209          0.3564
       3     0.1250  0.1319  0.1259  0.1230  0.1168          0.3774
       4     0.1225  0.1215  0.1223  0.1178  0.1145          0.4014
       5     0.1175  0.1233  0.1179  0.1096  0.1079          0.4238
       6     0.1155  0.1141  0.1154  0.1099  0.1062          0.4389
       7     0.3703  0.1382  0.0780  0.0788  0.0734          0.2613
       8     0.1298  0.3610  0.1290  0.0689  0.0696          0.2417
       9     0.1210  0.1121  0.3539  0.1211  0.0610          0.2309
      10     0.1225  0.1217  0.1226  0.3637  0.0385          0.2310
    
    Overall  0.1406  0.1477  0.1430  0.1890  0.0789          0.3008
    
    
    Dealer probabilities - 6 decks dealer hits soft 17....
    Count tags {1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,0,0,0,1}
    Specific removals (1 - 10): {0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0}
    Subgroup removals: None
    Running count (before up card is dealt): -10   Cards remaining: 104
    
    Up card    17      18      19      20      21      BJ     BUST
       1     0.0813  0.2098  0.2120  0.2116  0.1016          0.1838
       2     0.1392  0.1451  0.1366  0.1272  0.1204          0.3315
       3     0.1345  0.1422  0.1342  0.1250  0.1160          0.3480
       4     0.1318  0.1323  0.1309  0.1239  0.1143          0.3668
       5     0.1270  0.1335  0.1262  0.1167  0.1122          0.3845
       6     0.1163  0.1239  0.1247  0.1173  0.1115          0.4063
       7     0.3422  0.1408  0.0879  0.0868  0.0798          0.2625
       8     0.1394  0.3336  0.1296  0.0768  0.0756          0.2451
       9     0.1297  0.1223  0.3247  0.1199  0.0671          0.2364
      10     0.1288  0.1303  0.1305  0.3268  0.0453          0.2383
    
    Overall  0.1447  0.1531  0.1467  0.1733  0.0863          0.2959
    
    
    Dealer probabilities - 6 decks dealer hits soft 17....
    Count tags {1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,0,0,0,1}
    Specific removals (1 - 10): {0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0}
    Subgroup removals: None
    Running count (before up card is dealt): -20   Cards remaining: 104
    
    Up card    17      18      19      20      21      BJ     BUST
       1     0.0794  0.2135  0.2180  0.2154  0.1091          0.1647
       2     0.1481  0.1546  0.1409  0.1289  0.1197          0.3078
       3     0.1437  0.1519  0.1415  0.1270  0.1153          0.3206
       4     0.1407  0.1427  0.1387  0.1288  0.1139          0.3352
       5     0.1367  0.1432  0.1338  0.1227  0.1151          0.3485
       6     0.1200  0.1338  0.1332  0.1236  0.1154          0.3740
       7     0.3158  0.1448  0.0982  0.0947  0.0857          0.2608
       8     0.1498  0.3080  0.1313  0.0847  0.0811          0.2451
       9     0.1390  0.1333  0.2972  0.1195  0.0730          0.2380
      10     0.1352  0.1398  0.1388  0.2922  0.0527          0.2413
    
    Overall  0.1495  0.1589  0.1505  0.1613  0.0930          0.2869
    k_c

  11. #63


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by k_c View Post
    After dealer has checked for blackjack, dealer hits soft 17, RC = 0,-10,-20 before up card:

    k_c
    I’ve graphed all your results together. They match perfectly to Dog Hand’s CVData simulation results. Great work! Thank you!

  12. #64


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    I am thinking to simplify all these calculations by using this one function. The probability of a dealer ace up card as a function of TC can be written as,

    P_a=0.001966xTC + 0.07674.

    The probability of each ten-valued card is the same as above. With this basic formula, we can calculate out several different player’s advantages at all TCs. Earlier, I used this formula to find out that the player’s insurance advantage at TC=+6.5 is about 8% of the total player advantage at that moment, but many people disagreed with me.

  13. #65


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by aceside View Post
    I am thinking to simplify all these calculations by using this one function. The probability of a dealer ace up card as a function of TC can be written as,

    P_a=0.001966xTC + 0.07674.

    The probability of each ten-valued card is the same as above. With this basic formula, we can calculate out several different player’s advantages at all TCs. Earlier, I used this formula to find out that the player’s insurance advantage at TC=+6.5 is about 8% of the total player advantage at that moment, but many people disagreed with me.

    Insurance is a linear function. You have an even bet at +3 Hi-Lo in a 6-deck game. Each TC adds 2.3% to the insurance wager. For some reason, if you pick TC = +6.5, then your advantage is 3.5 x 2.3 = 8.05%. In other words, you're right.

    Don

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Bust It! Side Bet - Is it Viable for Card Counters?
    By MercySakesAlive in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-31-2016, 01:37 PM
  2. muliiple hits bust bonus
    By steveistheman84 in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-03-2014, 08:52 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.