Does the house worry about card-counters who are losing?

[DSchles]

People are different. Personalities are different too. He probably was not bold in real gambling because I read saying he was a shy guy.

You really have to stop. You've reached a point where, totally and completely ignorant on a subject, you will write anything just to hear yourself talk. Griffin not totally confident in his own math and theory???!!! Peter was and remains to this day the foremost theoretical mathematician on the game of blackjack the world has ever seen. Your statement is profoundly ignorant.

And he was NOT a losing player! He played for small stakes and surely played a fine winning game. He simply had no desire to play for higher stakes and, therefore, his wins were modest.

You would do yourself and this forum a huge favor if you wouldn't speculate in areas about which you know absolutely nothing whatsoever. Why not just be quiet? As the well-known saying goes: "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt."

Don