All other things being the same, rules, penetration, number of decks, etc. no-shuffle tracking, no hole carding. Is there any math or science that makes hand shuffle better, worse or the same as ASM?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
All other things being the same, rules, penetration, number of decks, etc. no-shuffle tracking, no hole carding. Is there any math or science that makes hand shuffle better, worse or the same as ASM?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
"between the conception and the reality, falls the shadow "
Paraphrased: T.S. Eliot's
The Hollow Men
Posting Permissions
-*-
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks