See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 13 of 18

Thread: CVCX - Confused about a result

  1. #1


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    CVCX - Confused about a result

    I made a simulation with CVCX and I don't understand something:

    H17, DAS --------> 13.11 (Win per hour) / 5.8 (ROR)

    H17, DAS, Sr ----> 12.96 (Win per hour) / 5.4 (ROR)


    S17, DAS --------> 19.85 (Win per hour) / 0.8 (ROR)

    S17, DAS, Sr ----> 25.09 (Win per hour) / 0.2 (ROR)


    What I don't undestand is: With H17 you expect a little less per hour with surrenden than without surrender! (But ROR as expected (only) a bit less)
    Why is that?

    The Thing is, with S17 it's totally different …. the surrender rule makes a big difference with the expected win per hour.

  2. #2


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Sorry, it was meant for the Software-Thread

  3. #3
    Random number herder Norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The mote in God's eye
    Posts
    12,474
    Blog Entries
    59


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Need screen shots. You may have settings that force limits which interfere with optimal bets. SCORE is what counts.
    "I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse

  4. #4

  5. #5
    Random number herder Norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The mote in God's eye
    Posts
    12,474
    Blog Entries
    59


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    You have Manually adjust Min Bet turned on. That will reduce the ability to create optimal betting with poor rules -- although it will do its best to optimize under the conditions set. You can only do so much with poor rules and constraints.
    "I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse

  6. #6


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Thanks!

    But still I'm confused, why with H17 rules it's so different than with S17 rules.. With H17 there is hardly any difference

  7. #7


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Grobbelaar View Post
    Thanks!

    But still I'm confused, why with H17 rules it's so different than with S17 rules.. With H17 there is hardly any difference
    You can expect a large increase in $win rate, regardless of H17 or S17, with Surrender over non surrender games. I don’t know how much difference there is by following Norms suggestion. If not much, then something else is at play.

    I note the shitty deck pen, and make reference to a prior post in a recent thread, where I said something about S17 making up for some shitty deck pen. You will see that difference in your sims. Of course, Snarky decided to affix his own version of what I said. He usually gets it wrong though.

    Curious though, are you using an unbalanced count system - if so, what?
    Last edited by Freightman; 10-10-2020 at 09:08 PM.

  8. #8


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Yes, it's unbalanced... REKO .. with some adjustments ... but I find it strange that surrender with S17 has so much more effect than with H17

  9. #9


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Grobbelaar View Post
    Yes, it's unbalanced... REKO .. with some adjustments ... but I find it strange that surrender with S17 has so much more effect than with H17
    To clarify
    Your H17 sims are not right. There should be a big difference, roughly 1/3 difference between your H17 Surrender vs H17 non surrender games. Further, S17 is such a valuable rule, that the $win rate between H17 and S17 games is significant.

  10. #10


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    But what did I wrong with the sims? That's one simulation I did with these 4 rules ... and that's what I got.
    I will try to run another simulation.

    I'm still learning about the software. But I don't know what's wrong.

  11. #11


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Grobbelaar View Post
    But what did I wrong with the sims? That's one simulation I did with these 4 rules ... and that's what I got.
    I will try to run another simulation.

    I'm still learning about the software. But I don't know what's wrong.
    try it with both 4.5/6 and 5.0/6, both H17 and S17. Just a thought, but overall $win rates will increase significantly, SCORE will rise significantly, and the expected much higher rate of surrender in a higher deck pen game might shock the H17 surrender win rate out of the doldrums caused by 4.0/6.

    besides, especially as a newbie, you don’t want to be playing 4/6.

  12. #12


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Hmmm.... I tried another simulation... it's about the same.... H17 DAS vs H17 DAS Sr is about the same.... no matter how the penetration is ... Even the score is slightly less with Surrender.... If I only knew what I'm doing wrong. It doesn't make sense to me. :-(

  13. #13


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Grobbelaar View Post
    Hmmm.... I tried another simulation... it's about the same.... H17 DAS vs H17 DAS Sr is about the same.... no matter how the penetration is ... Even the score is slightly less with Surrender.... If I only knew what I'm doing wrong. It doesn't make sense to me. :-(
    Did you buy the software, or did you download the demo?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. CVCX - confused about 1H/2H bet optimization
    By Optimus Prime in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 11-05-2019, 03:59 PM
  2. CVCX - confused about 1H/2H bet optimization
    By Optimus Prime in forum Software
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-01-2019, 11:43 AM
  3. backcount result
    By abc4000 in forum Software
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-10-2019, 09:41 PM
  4. Simulating Specific Shuffle Result
    By JamesonDetroit in forum Software
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-24-2018, 04:43 PM
  5. Red 7 vs. UBZ2 in CVCX. I'm confused.
    By Wino in forum Software
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 07-22-2016, 03:33 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.