Originally Posted by
Ultramood
For a 6D, 4 players, S17, 4.5/6 pen, no back counting, play all hands including negative counts, play 1 hand only,
Spread 1-25: SCORE = 18.18
Spread 1-50: SCORE = 23.11
But if you change just 1 rule, to 5/6 deck penetration and keep everything else the same.
Spread 1-15: The SCORE then achieves 25.01
or adding an additional rule, DAS. 4.5/6 Deck
Spread: 1-20. The SCORE is 25.00
I'm trying to create a scenario where the gaming conditions are absolute minimal and crappy. Combined with the least amount of player effort such as no back counting, playing only 1 hand, and playing through the entire shoe even if the count goes bad. This situation is definitely not what you wish and hope for. A "forced" on play like G Man said.
My point and what I'm understanding, a SCORE of 25 was barely achieved under those rules I've stated. And it goes to show you what "acceptable" but still "forced" the game's condition looks like at its bare minimum SCORE. And in-order to improve it, you have to find more beneficial rules such as DAS, RSA, SR, or better deck pen.
SCORE could be increased by; if you back count , play 2 hands, or don't play negative counts. But maybe you simply just don't want to or it's not your playing style. But that doesn't matter, that is not the point.
Does the minimal SCORE of 25 still apply if you don't back count, play entire shoe, and play only 1 hand? A better way to ask is, what is the minimum SCORE for a person who doesn't back count, plays entire shoe, and only plays 1 hand? With it being worthy for you to play and is profitable obviously.
Bookmarks