Attention BJAnalyst
Send me an email at [email protected]
I have a question to ask you which I don’t want to post in the forum. Thank you
For the record I gave you a helpful for your Opening Post because after looking through the humour I thought it was quite well written. Still, I think the idea of QTC needs further explanation and simulating to quantify its effect. Maybe Norm or Dog Hand can help you with that.
Casino Enemy No.1
Thanks for complement. Agree, it was well written. Further, agree to your comment on further simming, especially since I haven’t. Am I having fun with this thread? - yes.
https://youtu.be/vk7eA4gVDno
3 minute mark of Rainman link, nobody can count down a 6 deck shoe, so who can count down intermediates?
So, Let’s see now. I’ve got everyone wondering about this. Some of my fans would love to call me out on this, but it just sounds so.....legit, and they don’t want to......look so bad. Well, maybe, just maybe it is legit.
Clearly, we need some expert opinion. Perhaps Snarky and Douchebag6582 can weigh in. They’re certainly not shy about such things.
All the clues are there about results. Someone might ask the question the right way or actually get close to the answer. There’s been a half assed stab, but sometimes, you can’t see the forest for the trees. In any event, I calculate that I have at least several hours to work out what those results are before I have to explain the clues
Last edited by Freightman; 08-26-2020 at 02:33 AM.
"I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse
You keep implying that I am a ‘naysayer’ of yours, and all I can say to that is PLEASE don’t flatter yourself….REMEMBER, you are just a pimple on my ass, nothing more….EVER
You just hate like being corrected, like when:
you gave your ramp on an H17 NS game (-.66 he) and you were ramping up at +1, I simply pointed out to you that you are still behind, pal
or when you played with other counters and were so enamored with yourself when the TC rose and you put two big bets out and got “2 snappers” then returned to the table min….you said they left the table and you were wondering what they were thinking about you….so I said, perhaps, “this kat knows nothing about cover”
the only reason I remember these so vividly – aside from an impeccable memory – was how you ‘blew up at me’…also never heard of BJ=snapper, so that was memorable…I thought your reaction was so funny that whenever I see you posting ‘bull jive’ I point it out….and then laugh at your response(s)
FOR THE RECORD: I am not a paid member and don’t participate and know nothing about any rating system, or feedback….again, you are a pimple in my ass, nothing more
AND FOR THIS ‘SYSTEM’, I give you an A for effort, C for substance….only value I see is on hard 12/13 strategies and if/when a group is full (ie, no 2, 3, 4, 5s left) coupled w/ ASC, you may never hit a 16 no matter the up card….but these cases are so far and few in shoe games and in a SD game, your top three scenarios are ‘bull jive’ as Pinky pointed out you can’t have >16, so that’s minimized as well…other then that….just seems like a ‘weak’ cover system for those inclined….certainly, this system can’t be much of an ev move
Good luck
Actually, I don’t consider you a part of that group that I refer to as naysayers. Other than your self aggrandizing opinion of yourself, your flaw is withdrawing from debate you’ve initiated, after you’ve been hoisted
https://youtu.be/DZN4r8p6KbU
Speaking of zits, see about 100 seconds in
Bookmarks