For HL player who refuses to switch to KO use 5m9c as a side count to HL

[Norm]

There are a couple statements bjanalyst makes that require comment. First is the claim that CC is more accurate than sims. This is nonsense. CC is a back of the envelope estimate. It is useful. But, it is in no way as powerful as simulation. The second is that sims do not take into account how a human plays and sim perfect play. Also nonsense. CVData has several settings to simulate player and dealer errors, along with innumerable types of cover play.

[DSchles]

There are a couple statements bjanalyst makes that require comment. First is the claim that CC is more accurate than sims. This is nonsense. CC is a back of the envelope estimate. It is useful. But, it is in no way as powerful as simulation. The second is that sims do not take into account how a human plays and sim perfect play. Also nonsense. CVData has several settings to simulate player and dealer errors, along with innumerable types of cover play.

Bottom line: bjanalyst has been feeding us reams of verbal diarrhea that, I'm sure, most of us are sick of, all predicated on the most elementary of statistical measurements that became obsolete with blackjack studies ages ago. In SCORE, we have the gold standard for system comparisons. In CVData, we have the ultimate in simulation capacity.

The sad part of my jumping back into this thread is that it is going to prompt a 10-page response from bjanalyst that, of course, I won't read or respond to.

Don

[Freightman]

The sad part of my jumping back into this thread is that it is going to prompt a 10-page response from bjanalyst that, of course, I won't read or respond to.

Don

Who says you have to read a post before responding to it. I’ve responded to many posts with only the most cursory of reviews.

[beating vegas]

Bottom line: bjanalyst has been feeding us reams of verbal diarrhea that, I'm sure, most of us are sick of, all predicated on the most elementary of statistical measurements that became obsolete with blackjack studies ages ago. In SCORE, we have the gold standard for system comparisons. In CVData, we have the ultimate in simulation capacity.

The sad part of my jumping back into this thread is that it is going to prompt a 10-page response from bjanalyst that, of course, I won't read or respond to.

Don

I’m getting the impression that this count won’t be in your next book.

[beating vegas]

I have a new count. You keep a side count of 2,3,4,5,6,7,8 ,9 and Aces.

I haven’t done any sims. But this count will make you an extra 1 dollar an hour.

[21forme]

Who says you have to read a post before responding to it. I’ve responded to many posts with only the most cursory of reviews.

Obviously

[Freightman]

Obviously

Responded to with exactitude.

[Freightman]

I have a new count. You keep a side count of 2,3,4,5,6,7,8 ,9 and Aces.

I haven’t done any sims. But this count will make you an extra 1 dollar an hour.

Not surprised. Consider the FBM ASC, either Basic or Advanced

[ShipTheCookies]

Not surprised. Consider the FBM ASC, either Basic or Advanced

No thanks! My way is much better than any count strategy

[21forme]

Not surprised. Consider the FBM ASC, either Basic or Advanced

I think you need to add an intermediate strategy. With three different options, you have enough exciting new info to charge $3000 for a FBM bootcamp.

[beating vegas]

No thanks! My way is much better than any count strategy

+1

[beating vegas]

Not surprised. Consider the FBM ASC, either Basic or Advanced

That was a joke. I’m more then happy to stick with what I do.

Counting is one step above Basic strategy.

[beating vegas]

I’m going to put a great tip out.
Concentrate on deck estimation. Learn how to judge 1/4 decks. In the future you will thank me.