See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 27 to 39 of 62

Thread: When not to double hard 11 vs 9 or Ten

  1. #27


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Freightman View Post
    Don’t thank me so quickly. Your posts are repetitive, monotonous and absolutely maddening. I as simply saying that, buried within your lengthy novellas, are some advanced concepts. You need to simplify your absurdly complex posts into short simple easy to understand comments. You fail miserably at that task.
    Well, in this case I completely agree, and as a matter of point I think you were very kind in your assessment of the individual.

  2. #28


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by BoSox View Post
    Well, in this case I completely agree, and as a matter of point I think you were very kind in your assessment to the individual.
    But, believe it or not, buried, buried....... deep within the bowels of his posts, he reveals some very interesting shit. Now, to entice you to explore your Perry Mason inner you, BJAnalyst is not the purpose, simply One of the means.

    https://youtu.be/SKRma7PDW10

  3. #29


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Freightman View Post
    But, believe it or not, buried, buried....... deep within the bowels of his posts, he reveals some very interesting shit. Now, to entice you to explore your Perry Mason inner you, BJAnalyst is not the purpose, simply One of the means.

    https://youtu.be/SKRma7PDW10

    On the positive side of all of this, the casinos management spies who read these boards will NEVER EVER figure out those hidden nuggets of his. For that matter has anyone? After all it supposed to be nothing but simple math.

  4. #30


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Anyone think he is a reincarnation of T3?

  5. #31


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by 21forme View Post
    Anyone think he is a reincarnation of T3?
    I miss three. I gave him shit for his verbosity, but he also had hidden nuggets.

    No, definitely not three.

  6. #32


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by BoSox View Post
    On the positive side of all of this, the casinos management spies who read these boards will NEVER EVER figure out those hidden nuggets of his. For that matter has anyone? After all it supposed to be nothing but simple math.
    Not really hidden. SimpLy have to carefully and endlessly Decipher. It’s there, like a needle in a haystack.

    Some of that math is not so simple, such as when not to double 11v10 in a positive count, a concept puzzling to the unnamed poster in post 7 - or additional deck clarity as intimated by FBM Advanced..

  7. #33


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Anyone think bjanalyst is 21forme's another account?

  8. #34


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by BJGenius007 View Post
    Anyone think bjanalyst is 21forme's another account?
    Not a chance. Oh, and def8ntely not me - not enough typos.

  9. #35


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Freightman View Post
    Not a chance.
    I think the Genius' post was rhetorical stupidity. For the record, not a chance is right. As Richard Munchkin and other real players have said innumerable times, there are so many more important factors related to EV than count. Which count is used is so far down the list, it's almost irrelevant.

    Endless time and effort to improve EV by "inventing" a new and more complex count is nothing but mental masturbation.
    Last edited by 21forme; 07-27-2020 at 01:32 PM. Reason: fixed typo before Don saw it

  10. #36


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by BoSox View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Freightman View Post
    Your non doubles of 11 v 9 or 10 had nothing to do with risk averse and everything to do with possession of additional information (which most players don’t have). The unnamed poster in post 7 Clearly falls into that category of the uninformed.. The FBM ASC Basic provides this additional information effectively. Further, FBM Advanced provides information well in excess of what your toys provide.

    See - it can be said.........briefly.
    Just once in a while showing a little humility at times however brief in tone will garner more respect.
    Bosox, he's just having fun.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88B-v9BfEMs

  11. #37


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by 21frogman View Post
    Bosox, he's just having fun.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88B-v9BfEMs
    It’s twue, it’s twue (Attn Don - speech impediment inflection - no errors)
    With so much more to come.

    https://youtu.be/8qBrDf04jIc

  12. #38


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Freightman View Post
    Just to clarify

    The FBM ASC Basic provides this additional information effectively. Further, FBM Advanced provides information well in excess of what your toys provide.
    Please post link to FBM system that you have mentioned several times so you have piqued my curiosity about what is so great about FBM.

    I am very curious about what you are talking about.

    I could not find FBM on the Internet and when I googled count systems below, FBM was not mentioned as one of the count systems.

    https://www.blackjackreview.com/wp/e...m-comparisons/

    Thanks,

  13. #39


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by bjanalyst View Post
    Please post link to FBM system that you have mentioned several times so you have piqued my curiosity about what is so great about FBM.

    I am very curious about what you are talking about.

    I could not find FBM on the Internet and when I googled count systems below, FBM was not mentioned as one of the count systems.

    https://www.blackjackreview.com/wp/e...m-comparisons/

    Thanks,
    It's probably Freightman's own invention. You are trying to find a level count and level one secondary count to equal Hi-OPT II with ASC. It's going to be hard to do without side count the cards individually.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 18
    Last Post: 01-12-2016, 08:16 AM
  2. Double down on hard 12
    By redseven8 in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 04-09-2015, 10:07 AM
  3. sally young: double after double?
    By sally young in forum Blackjack Main
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-25-2005, 10:12 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.