See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast
Results 66 to 78 of 99

Thread: Consecutive losing sessions

  1. #66


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Midwest Player View Post
    I wonder what the odds are of 14 face cards coming out in a row on a 6 deck shoe?
    It happened either hand-shuffled or ASM. My argument is that it happens once in weeks playing hand-shuffled but six, seven shoes in one night at ASM table. Not fourteen face cards coming out in a row but thirteen face cards and two accent cards in a row. And often the two accent cards are like two and nine or three and eight. If the dealer gets the first accent card, he sweeps the table by getting to 21. And the effect of two concentrated face card sequences makes the dealer easier to make hand in the rest of the shoe. And in the past week, there are two friendly dealers telling me the same thing. In their 8 hour session, he made most hands in most of hands of almost every shoe, either by two face cards or lots of small cards together. One told me almost no one win at his table for one week. I didn't get surprised when they told me because it matched my expectation.

  2. #67


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Midwest Player View Post
    I wonder what the odds are of 14 face cards coming out in a row on a 6 deck shoe?<snip>
    Midwest Player,

    I get about 29,531,367 to 1 against, assuming "face cards" also includes the pip 10's.

    Hope this helps!

    Dog Hand

  3. #68


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Dog Hand View Post
    Midwest Player,

    I get about 29,531,367 to 1 against, assuming "face cards" also includes the pip 10's.

    Hope this helps!

    Dog Hand
    Thanks for the update.

  4. #69


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Dog Hand View Post
    Midwest Player,

    I get about 29,531,367 to 1 against, assuming "face cards" also includes the pip 10's.

    Hope this helps!

    Dog Hand
    Yup, been playing for 6+ years regularly and never complained about ASM’s until my post about extreme pen, absence of heat and weird, almost 30 million to one odd sequence coming out, repeated high counts, both positive and negative happenning shoe after shoe.

  5. #70


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by ZeeBabar View Post
    Yup, been playing for 6+ years regularly and never complained about ASM’s until my post about extreme pen, absence of heat and weird, almost 30 million to one odd sequence coming out, repeated high counts, both positive and negative happenning shoe after shoe.
    Someone is finally starting to listen to Zender.

  6. #71


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by ShipTheCookies View Post
    Someone is finally starting to listen to Zender.
    What did Zander say and where (link)?

  7. #72


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Dog Hand View Post
    I get about 29,531,367 to 1 against, assuming "face cards" also includes the pip 10's.
    Problem is, the OP never said that this was off the top of the shoe. So, what if all the small cards had come out, and there were nothing left but tens?

    Reduces the odds somewhat, to like ... 1 in 1.

    Just sayin'.

    Don

  8. #73


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Dog Hand View Post
    Midwest Player,

    I get about 29,531,367 to 1 against, assuming "face cards" also includes the pip 10's.

    Hope this helps!

    Dog Hand
    Doghand, the original situation was in a high count, so the odds are better. I was once playing in a monster count. Had 2 20's, split the tens 4x for each hand and got a total of 6 Ts and 2 aces. I couldn't keep from laughing (as I grabbed my chips and headed for the hills).

  9. #74


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    As I was saying. ...

    Don

  10. #75
    Senior Member JBourne's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Not near the ocean.
    Posts
    152


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by 21forme View Post
    Doghand, the original situation was in a high count, so the odds are better. I was once playing in a monster count. Had 2 20's, split the tens 4x for each hand and got a total of 6 Ts and 2 aces. I couldn't keep from laughing (as I grabbed my chips and headed for the hills).
    I played a monster count a few days ago. +23 with one deck remaining. What's the probability of that? I could see the cut card about to come out, the pen was really good. I expect ~34 (65%) out of the remaining pack to be tens because I don't track aces. The next five cards come out and none are high cards. I am staring at two max bet hands of 15 vs. 8. That's <0.5% probability of that sequence? I played the deviation and stood on both hands, fully expecting to lose when the dealer flips an ace or ten. The dealer flipped a 7 for 15 total. Now that's <0.2% probability of the sequence? But each card is an independent event and the probability of not flipping an 10/A after I stood was ~28%. The dealer then busted with 10. It was the last round in the shoe and I scooped chips and scooted knowing I just got lucky on two bad hands and a very improbable sequence.

    Are we really surprised when 10+ little cards come out of an ice-cold shoe? Seems like I have watched a dealer rake a table like that. Getting 10+ face cards out on the table in a row would be worthy of a picture for sure, but it would just go on my list of bad beats (or ties as it may be). I have a photo of me re-splitting 6-6 vs. 6 until I had seven hands. Gotta love unlimited re-splits. The count was neutral with 3.5 decks remaining. I lost them all. What were the odds of that entire sequence happening? It doesn't matter.

  11. #76


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Dog Hand View Post
    Midwest Player,

    I get about 29,531,367 to 1 against, assuming "face cards" also includes the pip 10's.

    Hope this helps!

    Dog Hand
    Hi Dog Hand,

    I get the exact same result, by computing

    (96 * 95 * 94 * ... * 83)
    -----------------------------
    (312 * 311 * ... * 300 * 299)

    (14 factors in numerator and denominiator each).

  12. #77


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    This question would get a better answer from a loving grandma or a psychiatrist.

  13. #78


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Zee, it looks like you deleted the post where you named the three casinos. If I remember only two of those casinos were under the same ownership. It looks like the third was under different ownership. It seems weird casinos under two different owners would try anything hanky-panky.

Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. How Many Consecutive Days Did You Win Playing Blackjack
    By Midwest Player in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-01-2017, 08:23 AM
  2. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-25-2015, 04:39 PM
  3. newtobj: losing sessions
    By newtobj in forum Blackjack Beginners
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 12-23-2003, 06:43 AM
  4. john williams: CONSECUTIVE LOSES
    By john williams in forum Blackjack Main
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-05-2002, 01:45 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.