The point is that responding with what is wrong with a post is useful to other readers. Responding with a growing list of insults that generate yet more insults is disruptive and useful to no one.
The point is that responding with what is wrong with a post is useful to other readers. Responding with a growing list of insults that generate yet more insults is disruptive and useful to no one.
"I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse
Ask a stupid question, get a stupid answer. The OP should know the answer to his question. By his logic, the first base player on a true "Double Exposure" game would screw everybody else over.
This has been said too many times.....
OTHER PLAYERS PLAY AT THE TABLE HAVE NO LONG TERM EFFECT ON YOURS!!!!
What is so hard for you to understand? How others play, be it one ploppy or three other ploppies, splitting 10’s or never hitting, it does NOT matter. It will have just as much a positive effect as a negative effect, in the long run, no effect.
In the example you give, first ploppy splits 10,s gets a 6 and a 6 on each of his tens, stands on his 16,s, the second ploppy is not hitting his 5 and 7 (12 total), you double on your 9,2 against a dealer 9, and you get a 10 for a 21 total, dealer ends up with 18. Both ploppies lose, you get a double down win! If the first ploppy had not split his 10’s, the second ploppy had not stood, you would have lost that double down. You should be kissing those ugly ploppies instead of bitching on this forum.
Bookmarks