Quick Question, is the Illustrious 18 the same if I'm using Wong Halves instead of Hi-Lo?
Thanks
1) I guess you're entitled to your opinion, but he didn't specifically say each individual index; he asked if the I18 (collectively?) were the same for the two count systems.
2) Insurance is the BIGGEST difference?? See p. 53 of Wong's Pro BJ. Floored to the nearest integer, they would be identical for all numbers of decks, no?
Don
Reminds me of a 1 liner.
This guy named Schles was in the hospital. This older nurse came back to the nurses station and exclaims - there this guy who has Schles tattooed on his schmekell.
A pretty young thing doesnt believe this and decides to take a look for herself. She returns a few minutes later and exclaims - it doesn’t say Schles, it says Schlesinger.
Sorry Don, couldn’t resist.
1 it makes more sense if he is asking if the numbers are the same index numbers per play. Almost all are exact, EXCEPT
2 insurance, yes, the biggest difference. I didnt say it was a BIG difference. I said the BIGGEST difference in any differences between hi lo and halves. Im not talking flooring. I hate that. Flooring means 3.0 and 3.9 are the same. Theyre not.
1. Illustrious 18 are a series of plays. Strike points vary by index number used over the spectrum of count systems, but are essentially the same.
2. Hi Lo and halves are remarkably identical, which makes halves a natural choice when deciding on stronger systems. The insurance strike points occur at the same point in time, though the true value is different per count - because allowances must be made for the 9 - which is counted at halves, but not Hi Lo.
3. Flooring is the safest, I understand your comment. Sim by half true counts which alleviates your concerns. You will note that ramps are slightly different when simming by half true counts versus full true counts. Also, you can learn to to interpolate, which is a powerful tool.
Bookmarks