See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 13 of 36

Thread: Complete newbie Basic Strat. question

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Complete newbie Basic Strat. question

    Ok...here we go. I'll be playing mostly shoe games. I've decided, that once I learn B.S. that I'll be using the KO method. Regarding B.S. I've just read "Burning The Tables In Las Vegas" and had a question regarding chapters 7 and 9 where he goes over "covers" and "guises".
    If I was planning on using his suggestions regarding 1) Always stand on A-7 v 9,10,A, 2) Stand (or surrender)on H16 v 10, 3)Always insure a BJ and 4)Always insure an A.
    Or, ignore the above and just ALWAYS surrender: 16 v 8-A, 15 v 9-A, 14 v 10-A, 8-8 v 10.
    My questions are; are these covers wise? and secondly, if they are shouldn't I just learn B.S. using these revisions rather than the "proper way" which I'd be changing anyway ?
    Open to (and hoping for) any advice I can get.............THANKS.

  2. #2


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    The book you’re referring to essentially advises a series of low cost errors in order to 8ncrease longevity. It is also directed to the individual playing higher stakes, as in min 50 or 100.

    You’re clearly a newbie, likely playing red chip wagers. You cannot afford these low cost errors. They will erode an already low $per hour win rate.

    Learn BS perfectly. Surrender only when called for, don’t worry about cover.

    After you’ve learned BS perfectly, learn indices as in when to deviate from BS. It starts with baby steps.

  3. #3


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Freightman View Post
    The book you’re referring to essentially advises a series of low cost errors in order to 8ncrease longevity. It is also directed to the individual playing higher stakes, as in min 50 or 100.

    You’re clearly a newbie, likely playing red chip wagers. You cannot afford these low cost errors. They will erode an already low $per hour win rate.

    Learn BS perfectly. Surrender only when called for, don’t worry about cover.

    After you’ve learned BS perfectly, learn indices as in when to deviate from BS. It starts with baby steps.
    sage advice

  4. #4


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Hello!
    First, I am one of the least-experienced folks who posts on this site, so take my thoughts with a grain of salt, if I am contradicted... However..
    * If you are not counting yet, there is not a reason to use cover. Altering play from basic strategy will just be throwing money away.
    * You are correct by starting with basic strategy. As you learning, make sure you learn *why* the basic strategy plays are correct. As you begin to count, you will deviate from those plays at the deck composition changes. Understanding the *why* behind basic strategy will help you to learn those ideal deviations (indices).
    * Once you start counting cards, you will need to disguise your play so that you don't get asked to leave the casino. One way to do that is to make poor playing decisions. They cost a little bit of money in the short run, but will help keep you from being tossed. Camouflage (or cover) can take quite a few forms.
    * As you are learning BS, watch the players around you. Listen to their comments. When you start to count, you want to be able to adopt their mannerisms so that the casino management thinks you are just another one of them. This form of cover is less expensive than making poor playing decisions.

    Now, by others' responses, we'll find out if I am learning anything....

  5. #5


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Splitting Tens View Post
    Hello!
    First, I am one of the least-experienced folks who posts on this site, so take my thoughts with a grain of salt, if I am contradicted... However..
    * If you are not counting yet, there is not a reason to use cover. Altering play from basic strategy will just be throwing money away.
    * You are correct by starting with basic strategy. As you learning, make sure you learn *why* the basic strategy plays are correct. As you begin to count, you will deviate from those plays at the deck composition changes. Understanding the *why* behind basic strategy will help you to learn those ideal deviations (indices).
    * Once you start counting cards, you will need to disguise your play so that you don't get asked to leave the casino. One way to do that is to make poor playing decisions. They cost a little bit of money in the short run, but will help keep you from being tossed. Camouflage (or cover) can take quite a few forms.
    * As you are learning BS, watch the players around you. Listen to their comments. When you start to count, you want to be able to adopt their mannerisms so that the casino management thinks you are just another one of them. This form of cover is less expensive than making poor playing decisions.

    Now, by others' responses, we'll find out if I am learning anything....
    A nice post from a newbie. The only thing I would take issue with is purposely making poor playing decisions for camo purposes, if you are not seasoned and playing low stakes. I guarantee that, until OP is seasoned, he will make bett8ng and play errors, and quite possibly not even notice.
    Last edited by Freightman; 07-01-2019 at 10:07 AM.

  6. #6


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    I should have worded that better... I was referencing his book’s suggestions on deviating from correct play as a form of cover. I would not recommend it for any new player - including myself. We newer folks don’t need to give money away.

  7. #7


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    The OP said he's not counting, yet. So, he should be flat betting and not able to Wong yet. I prefer to practice in a casino than on a computer - which I find boring.
    I would suggest that he accept that he will lose money as he learns and just play very small stakes....

  8. #8


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Splitting Tens View Post
    The OP said he's not counting, yet. So, he should be flat betting and not able to Wong yet. I prefer to practice in a casino than on a computer - which I find boring.
    I would suggest that he accept that he will lose moneymy ip birthday wishes tneb as he learns and just play very small stakes....
    My recommendation would be to remain patient and don't start playing for $ until you have both BS and KO down pat. After that, I would not play with cover or a card and stick to short sessions and include Wonging and table hopping as part of my overall strategy.
    Last edited by mopakarim3400; 07-05-2019 at 01:11 PM.

  9. #9


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    I will assume you plan to study the B.S. & KO until you can make the proper plays in your sleep. (Purchase CVBJ if you have not done so already.)

    You will need to ask yourself many other questions:

    (1) Will you be playing locally at a couple of casinos, or will you be traveling to spread your action around? The more you concentrate your action at local places, the more cover you will need. However, be aware that cover will not stop them from figuring out you are playing a winning game. Lifetime earnings will eventually get you the tap on the shoulder.

    (2) Will you be playing at a level that requires cover?

    (3) Do you plan to play short sessions and hit & run - or Wong? BTW: If you are not familiar with the term "Wong," I am asking if you plan to jump in and out of games so as to only play favorable counts.

    (4) Do you plan to play rated? The consensus of the professionals on this forum is that the comps are not worth the hassle. You may come to a different conclusion if your goals are modest.

    ---
    * I did not address your specific questions about the various cover plays because you can look up the cost of each cover play and decide for yourself if the cost is worth it. You should learn the correct B.S. because there will be plenty of times when cover is not needed and there is no sense in throwing money away.

    ** I should also note that your "act" or "persona" will get you a lot further than some cover plays that will probably not even be noticed. The idea is to never have them want to look at you and check your play.

  10. #10


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    I think losses stemming from mistakes in the beginning are inevitable and nothing substitutes for the experience of jumping in the deep end and giving it a go. Just do it at the lowest stakes. Success requires failure.

  11. #11


    0 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Freightman, a 1000% with you. You cant entirely learn how to drive on a highway, practicing in your driveway and the same goes for card counting.

    one way I differ from others is that I say, use a card in your local casinos when you are still starting to learn as they would come to know you from your daily visits. You will be making mistakes and it helps you. I ended up getting regular meal comps and then room comps in LasVegas, MS and LA. Once You go outside your area, you can use the comps to stay, go out and play anonymously.

    There are are strategies to how you play when using a card once you get more accomplished (booking losses, keeping wins small, etc).

    I made mistakes that got me on a database and unwelcome at local casinos but if I had to start all over again, I would still get a card, just not make some mistakes using it.

  12. #12


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by krly View Post
    Ok...here we go. I'll be playing mostly shoe games. I've decided, that once I learn B.S. that I'll be using the KO method. Regarding B.S. I've just read "Burning The Tables In Las Vegas" and had a question regarding chapters 7 and 9 where he goes over "covers" and "guises".
    First, let me say welcome to the board. Now regarding that book, you are reading I strongly feel that is not the right book "more geared for high stakes play" for as you say in the title of the thread complete newbie. A much more appropriate choice would be something like Stanford Wong's Professional Blackjack or Blackbelt In Blackjack by Arnold Synder.

  13. #13
    Senior Member bigplayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    1,807


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    No, they aren't wise. If you're playing basic strategy while counting a skills check will likely say you're an error prone non-advantage player.

    Sent from my SM-G960U1 using Tapatalk

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Look out, complete newbie.
    By bdam123 in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 01-31-2013, 05:56 AM
  2. newbie-newbie-doo: Back-counting question
    By newbie-newbie-doo in forum Blackjack Beginners
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-02-2005, 12:04 AM
  3. bigguy350: Basic Strat Quizzes
    By bigguy350 in forum Blackjack Beginners
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-07-2005, 08:42 AM
  4. creatureman: basic strat question???
    By creatureman in forum Blackjack Beginners
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-14-2004, 03:31 PM
  5. Whip: Complete newbie...
    By Whip in forum Blackjack Beginners
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-20-2003, 03:20 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.