21forme, in case you haven’t read any of Arnold Synder’s books, I’d argue this shows the strength of Zee’s game. Zee is able to play and “get away with it”. Anybody can play and get thrown out quickly. That takes no talent.Originally Posted by 21forme
Btw, did you attend one of the BJA Bootcamps? This is their strategy. Play with no cover and expect the backoff and then rinse and repeat at the next casino.
Of course he gets “away with it”.
He is self confessed to poor spreads, bad ramping, frightened to put the money out, ignores or does not know correct index play, avoids the correct play as in doubles and splits if it means putting more max bets on the table, leaves high count shoes in case it erodes profits - plus I’m sure they’re are also second class habits as part of his playing arsenal.
I now wait, with baited breath, for your defence of the irrational and substandard Zeeish behaviours.
Didn't know you spoke Canadian, but I'm not surprised...
Normally I don't see your posts, as you're on my ignore list (as is Zee), but when somebody else quotes it (you owe me, Bosox), I do see it. So I'll respond this one time.
Yes, I've read Synder's books, a long time ago.
No, I've never attended a BJA boot camp. I've been doing this a long time and have no need to. I once met Colin at a BJ table, purely by accident. He quickly recognized my play as that of an AP and promptly moved to another table, as "AP etiquette" dictates.
Freightman summed it up well, so no need for me to add anything further regarding your errant analysis. Unlike Freightman, I am not waiting with bated breath for your reply nor the subsequent trolling you will surely provide.
Dbs, people who take the game seriously also pay attention to who is doing the talking. What you state as Freighter sidestepping into tangents and stick to the subject at hand is ignoring the complete picture. The freighter's very KIND response whether diverted or not was true and accurate and speaks for itself. Please look at reality for a change, you may enjoy reading trips reports from your favorite poster and think that he knows his shit but it appears you are always just trolling.
Bosox, my reply was in reference to the post at hand. Zee made an excellent post, stating that he got to still play, while spreading 1-5, while another Bozo AP got kicked out after only one shoe, spreading 1-12. Zee also said this was a DD game, which was an important piece of information.
People who “take the game seriously” should understand that spreading 1-12 is not a good idea on DD if you want to have any kind of longevity at a casino. Zee gave a classic example for why this is the case. And he ended his post with a “chuckle, chuckle”, which was a nice touch, illustrating how stupid this AP was.
Bosox, it appears you are having the same problem that your idol, Freightman, is having, and that is staying on topic. Freightman went off on a lengthy rant about some bad plays Zee has made in the past, as if that was somehow relevant to the post at hand. For the record, it was not.
You went on your own little rant about how I like Zee’s trip report, which also was not relevant to the topic at hand. Yes, I like Zee’s trip reports, but this has nothing to do with why I defended him in this thread.
If it makes you feel better calling it “trolling” when someone defends an excellent post, then go for it. Being on these forums, I’ve come to find out in the AP world when someone doesn’t agree with someone else they usually label it as “trolling”. In the real world, it’s called having a different opinion. It’s what makes our country great. Freedom of speech, and being able to express our opinions, even when they might be different than someone else’s.
The first amendment to the constitution of the United States - certainly and article of wonder. To express an opinion at the top of your lungs what another individual would express at the top of his lungs in opposition.
It allows peckerheads like you to express idiocies with no foundation, to extol debunked commentary fir the sole purpose of misdirection and fraud.
I realize the many venues you frequent allow you an opportunity for pleasuring yourself as a means of self gratification - it would a favour to the majority for you to withdraw. You could just as easily go to the bathroom, and gratify yourself there.
Isn’t freedom of speech wonderful?
In reply to ZeeBabar:
I like ZeeBabar and I will try to avoid making this discussion about him as this is all about you Dbs and your constant deliberate provocations, that turn threads into battles. I know, I know free speech and all.
Posting Permissions
-*-
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks