1 out of 1 members found this post helpful.
Did you find this post helpful?
Yes |
No
Originally Posted by
Midwest Player
Variance is just part of the game with blackjack. If we can reduce variance I think that is good, but it usually comes at the expense of expected value. I believe "Three" has posted he has found a way to reduce variance. I imagine others have also managed to reduce variance. So I was wondering how much of a difference is there between your best day and worst day this year. For example if the biggest one day win you had this year was $1,000 and the biggest one day loss was $900 then that is a $1,900 swing. I assume the higher stakes you are playing the larger this swing will be.
Anyway, the difference between my largest one day win and largest one day loss so far this year is $2,145, which is the difference between a four figure win and a three figure loss. My second largest one day swing is $1,641. This is mostly at the red chip level. Win rate this year per average 6 hour session is 83%.
Anyone else willing to share their swings this year? Include if your playing level is red chip, green chip, or black chip.
MW, what is this? You show me yours and I'll show you mine? What value is there in you knowing what my (or anyones) swings are? Are you sublty asking for some opinion on the veracity of your results? If so, much more data is required.
Your stated win rate for average 6 hour sessions is 83%? How do you define a session because I am really suspect of any AP who can play 6 hour sessions and win 83% of the time and not get 86'd? Is that enough sessions to have any statistical significance?
If it is merely a social exchange of experiences, then I apologize for my over reaction and in that case my range is a few thousand both ways. If I have misunderstood, then please rephrase the question.
Don't mean to be a contrarian it is just that statistics are valuable at defining questions but not so effective at providing answers. I primarily use playing statistics to validate the efficacy of the players game and the session Z-score is the trigger for more in depth analysis which may include a discussion of the specifics of the session with the player.
Otherwise, in the 7,000+ sessions that I have detailed records for (not all my play), the average win was always very close to the average loss but we won 65% of the sessions. A session was any time you played at a table and until you left that table.
I would add that my priority is to devise games with adequate EV and exceptional cover which often, but not always, dictates increased variance.
Luck is nothing more than probability taken personally!
Bookmarks