See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 94 of 94 FirstFirst ... 4484929394
Results 931 to 936 of 936

Thread: Adding AA78mTc side count to High Low

  1. #931


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by seriousplayer View Post
    Why won't Norm just close this thread? Well, it is ultimately his forum.
    Still 70 posts short of 1000.

  2. #932


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Norm View Post
    It is trivial to create a system that beats Hi-Opt II ASC. Just make it more complex. Your system, in my mind and the mind of others here, is more complex. And now, you'll repast again. Boring.
    If I was wrong the users of this forum would have been all over me. No one has found any errors in any of my calculations or in anything I have posted.

    After users attacked me by saying that my system could not beat HO2 w ASC was shown to be false what do they have left to attack me with. Of course, say my system is complex!

    If users want me to calculate for the LS back counted shoe game KO with just 5m7c or KO with 5m7c and Am9c I will but only if they are polite. And I will not have any time to do that until next month.


    Last edited by bjanalyst; 04-05-2019 at 02:29 AM.

  3. #933


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by therefinery View Post
    This sure took a turn. How do I put this kindly? What an arrogant prick you are. Don and Norm have forgotten more about BJ than you'll ever understand. Go argue with Ole's excellent post showing why your creation is trivial.
    I stand by the simulation results. My system beat HO2 w ASC and for the LS game beat it by a large amount.

    I have been polite throughout these posts until recently because I have now been insulted again and again. It is just too much so I finally insulted back which I probably should not have done. There is supposed to be some etiquette and politeness. I will not insult anymore.

    Users have the results of my system. If they don't like it don't use it but don't insult me either. Constructive criticism is OK, insults are never OK. So I will no longer insult and I expect the same from users of this forum.


    Last edited by bjanalyst; 04-05-2019 at 02:31 AM.

  4. #934


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Norm View Post
    I’ll give an example of ETF’s work. He wrote a paper comparing OPP (a junk count) with HiLo. He determined that HiLo wasn’t that much better, but much more difficult. He ran HiLo with no indices, no insurance, and no true count betting. His argument was that it wouldn’t be fair to compare OPP with HiLo unless HiLo was used without a TC since OPP didn’t have a TC. Ignore the fact that HiLo in this manner is not HiLo. Counting depends on some manner of taking into account remaining cards. OPP has this. Any RC system has this. HiLo has it too. It’s called TC. If you remove TC from HiLo, it can’t take into account remaining cards. So, his conclusion was that OPP was easier than HiLo but close to as good (so long as you cripple HiLo). What’s more ridiculous is HiLo with no indices, and no TC, is actually easier than OPP, yet still better.

    Like saying I can shoot better than LeBron James, so long as you tie his arms behind his back. (OK, he could still outshoot me.) ETF simply does not have a basic understanding of strategy comparison, no matter how many of us have tried to explain it to him.
    I was unaware of this by ETFAN. All I know is that he helped me. And I the results of the sims show my analysis was correct.

    At any rate, I do not like insulting anyone and I had refrained from insults until recently. I will not insult anymore but I also expect politeness from the users of this forum also.

    I appreciate the constructive feedback I received and especially appreciate Gronbog's simulations.

  5. #935


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by seriousplayer View Post
    Why won't Norm just close this thread? Well, it is ultimately his forum.
    If users are polite and if they want me to analyze for the LS back counted game KO with 5m7c and KO with 5m7c and Am9c I will. That is all that is left to be done.

    If not then the results of my system have been posted and there is nothing else to say.

    And I apologize for being a bit rude in recent posts and especially if I offended anyone. I had not been rude until recently.

    I do not like insulting but I also do not like being insulted and the insults finally got the better of me.

    Always be polite and have proper etiquette. And I hope the users of this forum will also be polite going forward.

  6. #936
    Random number herder Norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The mote in God's eye
    Posts
    10,069
    Blog Entries
    59


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Thanks for ending on a reasonably polite note.

    At 935 posts, this is exhausted. Thread closed.

Page 94 of 94 FirstFirst ... 4484929394

Similar Threads

  1. Adding AA78mTc to High Low
    By bjanalyst in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-19-2018, 08:26 AM
  2. High Edge Side Bets
    By knoxstrong in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 09-26-2018, 02:38 PM
  3. Betting side bet lucky ladies on High Counts?
    By Tenlavuu in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-01-2018, 05:24 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.